test: extend the remaining bulk-operation trash waits to 60s

[baronunread]

PR #25 gave the trash purge waits a 60s budget, but the same load-induced flake (#24) lives in every wait that gates on a multi-file storage round trip. PR #22's CI just failed on the next one over: the bigbatch grouping wait (queryAllByText("bigbatch").length === 1) — 25 children plus the folder marker have to be copied into Trash before that row can appear, and the 15s default ran out on a runner where the suite's very first test alone took 13s.

This extends the three remaining bulk-operation waits in foldersAndTrash.ts to the same 60s budget:

• the bigbatch grouping wait (the one that actually failed)
• the 12-file bulk-selection removal check
• the trash listing check for those same 12 items

Follow-up to #24 / #25. Once merged, re-running #22's failed check job should go green (the job tests the PR merge ref, so it picks this up without a rebase).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Improved reliability of Trash-related scenarios involving large folders and selections by allowing additional time for storage operations to complete.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f0a25942-6e37-4f35-adc2-42fea24b41de

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 82f121d and 8007bd6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/scenarios/foldersAndTrash.ts

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Changes

Trash scenario waits

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Extend Trash assertion waits tests/scenarios/foldersAndTrash.ts	Folder grouping and large-selection Trash assertions now use explicit 60_000 millisecond waitFor timeouts.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes

Possibly related issues

• [Bug] Trash purge scenario flakes under load and dumps megabytes of DOM on failure #24 — Updates related Trash scenario waits in the same test file.

Possibly related PRs

• baronunread/lopload#25 — Directly overlaps by extending Trash scenario waitFor timeouts.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately summarizes the main change: extending remaining trash-related bulk-operation waits to 60s.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/issue-24-followup-bulk-waits

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[baronunread]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Action performed

Review finished.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.