Convert websocket URLs to HTTP instead of raising findings

[liquidsec]

addresses #1035

Summary

Closes #1035

• ws:// URLs discovered by excavate are now converted to http:// and emitted as URL_UNVERIFIED events
• wss:// URLs are converted to https:// and emitted as URL_UNVERIFIED events
• Neither produces a "Non-HTTP URI" FINDING anymore
• Other non-HTTP schemes (ftp, ldap, smb, etc.) continue to produce findings as before

Websocket endpoints run on the same web server and ports as HTTP, so treating them as standard URLs lets them flow through the normal pipeline (httpx, excavate, etc.) instead of generating noise.

[github-actions]

📊 Performance Benchmark Report

Comparing 3.0 (baseline) vs websocket-url-fix (current)

📈 Detailed Results (All Benchmarks)

📋 Complete results for all benchmarks - includes both significant and insignificant changes

🧪 Test Name	📏 Base	📏 Current	📈 Change	🎯 Status
Bloom Filter Dns Mutation Tracking Performance	4.14ms	4.29ms	+3.5% ⚪	✅
Bloom Filter Large Scale Dns Brute Force	17.49ms	17.62ms	+0.7% ⚪	✅
Large Closest Match Lookup	361.56ms	337.43ms	-6.7% ⚪	✅
Realistic Closest Match Workload	190.15ms	187.00ms	-1.7% ⚪	✅
Event Memory Medium Scan	1784 B/event	1784 B/event	+0.0% ⚪	✅
Event Memory Large Scan	1768 B/event	1768 B/event	+0.0% ⚪	✅
Event Validation Full Scan Startup Small Batch	415.08ms	410.42ms	-1.1% ⚪	✅
Event Validation Full Scan Startup Large Batch	563.85ms	585.35ms	+3.8% ⚪	✅
Make Event Autodetection Small	30.65ms	31.36ms	+2.3% ⚪	✅
Make Event Autodetection Large	314.13ms	317.07ms	+0.9% ⚪	✅
Make Event Explicit Types	13.66ms	13.99ms	+2.4% ⚪	✅
Excavate Single Thread Small	3.961s	3.982s	+0.5% ⚪	✅
Excavate Single Thread Large	9.522s	9.516s	-0.1% ⚪	✅
Excavate Parallel Tasks Small	4.172s	4.123s	-1.2% ⚪	✅
Excavate Parallel Tasks Large	7.268s	7.221s	-0.6% ⚪	✅
Is Ip Performance	3.22ms	3.17ms	-1.7% ⚪	✅
Make Ip Type Performance	11.69ms	11.46ms	-2.0% ⚪	✅
Mixed Ip Operations	4.57ms	4.50ms	-1.6% ⚪	✅
Memory Use Web Crawl	40.6 MB	40.5 MB	-0.4% ⚪	✅
Memory Use Subdomain Enum	19.4 MB	19.3 MB	-0.1% ⚪	✅
Scan Throughput 100	7.833s	8.243s	+5.2% ⚪	✅
Scan Throughput 1000	42.471s	43.064s	+1.4% ⚪	✅
Typical Queue Shuffle	65.55µs	64.86µs	-1.1% ⚪	✅
Priority Queue Shuffle	741.34µs	723.25µs	-2.4% ⚪	✅

🎯 Performance Summary

✅ No significant performance changes detected (all changes <10%)

---

🐍 Python Version 3.11.15

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 94.44444% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 91%. Comparing base (39b9d31) to head (5a0d8d4).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on 3.0.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...t/test_step_2/module_tests/test_module_excavate.py	93%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##             3.0   #3037   +/-   ##
=====================================
+ Coverage     91%     91%   +1%     
=====================================
  Files        440     440           
  Lines      37411   37429   +18     
=====================================
+ Hits       33890   33910   +20     
+ Misses      3521    3519    -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.