Open-source launch docs and acceptance test#4
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: bfe48f1b9e
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| - [ ] `pnpm install` | ||
| - [ ] Copy `sourcedraft.config.example.json` → `sourcedraft.config.json` and adjust paths | ||
| - [ ] Copy `.env.example` → `.env` with `CMS_ADMIN_PASSWORD`, `GITHUB_TOKEN`, `GITHUB_OWNER`, `GITHUB_REPO` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Following this setup step leaves Studio auth unconfigured because the server reads only SOURCEDRAFT_ADMIN_PASSWORD (apps/studio/server/auth.ts) and .env.example defines that same name, not CMS_ADMIN_PASSWORD. In the manual acceptance flow this causes the subsequent login step to fail with “SOURCEDRAFT_ADMIN_PASSWORD is not configured” even though the checklist was followed.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
Closing retroactive split-stack review PR. Continuing from protected main with scoped feature PRs. |
1 participant
PR 3 of 11. Issue templates, changelog, screenshots docs, manual acceptance test.