docs: audit June 23 scaling roadmap ownership#1112
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughスケーリングロードマップの権威関係を更新し、2026-06-23版を所有権・依存関係インデックスとして再構成した。要件別の所有者、監査状態、追加ギャップ、依存順序、完了条件を定義した。 Changesスケーリングロードマップの再構成
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@codex review Audit evidence: documentation-only change; origin/main and pull request states were refreshed on 2026-07-18. The June 12 milestones are mapped requirement-by-requirement to focused owners or explicit unowned follow-up documents. No runtime semantics changed. Local git diff --check passed and golangci-lint reported 0 issues. |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the scaling roadmap document into a structured 'Scaling roadmap ownership index' that catalogs requirements, canonical owners, implementation status, and dependencies. The review feedback suggests clarifying an incomplete phrase regarding multi-group soak evidence and improving terminology consistency by changing 'hotspot M2/M3' to 'hotspot split M2/M3'.
Important
The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b915aec352
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ef7e81afd8
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Addressed the current-head roadmap findings in signed commit f26275a.
Validation: GitHub PR state and merge history were re-queried, git diff --check passed, and the signed commit hook reported 0 lint issues. @codex review |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/design/2026_06_23_proposed_scaling_roadmap.md`:
- Line 108: Update the “Required focused owner” column heading in the roadmap
table to natural English, using “Focused owner required” or the simpler
“Required owner” while preserving the table’s intended meaning.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: f625e585-4c65-4a19-a12b-ee98c0522e17
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/design/2026_06_12_proposed_scaling_roadmap.mddocs/design/2026_06_23_proposed_scaling_roadmap.md
…ap-2026-06-23 # Conflicts: # docs/design/2026_06_12_proposed_scaling_roadmap.md
|
Updated the signed head to 29de6da.
The heading-only commit used the already-validated documentation path while another repository-wide lint process held golangci-lint's global lock; the preceding signed docs commit passed the hook with 0 issues. @codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
@copilot resolve the merge conflicts in this pull request |
…ap-2026-06-23 # Conflicts: # docs/design/2026_06_23_proposed_scaling_roadmap.md
Merged the latest |
Summary
Scope
Documentation only. Runtime behavior is unchanged.
Validation
Risk
Pull request states are an audited snapshot and must be refreshed before merge or deployment.
Summary by CodeRabbit