Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade urllib3 from 2.0.7 to 2.6.0#30

Open
brainer3220 wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-685d93080b9e267fe7dd5afb3f202dfd
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade urllib3 from 2.0.7 to 2.6.0#30
brainer3220 wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-685d93080b9e267fe7dd5afb3f202dfd

Conversation

@brainer3220
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • requirements.txt

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 8, 2025 09:50
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

certifi>=2023.7.22 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
werkzeug>=2.2.3 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
python-dotenv
urllib3>=2.6.0 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Avoid urllib3 pin above boto3’s supported range

Pinning urllib3>=2.6.0 while the same requirements file still declares boto3 causes pip to fail dependency resolution: botocore (a boto3 dependency) currently caps urllib3 at <1.27, so no version satisfies both constraints and pip install -r requirements.txt will error. Unless boto3 is dropped or upgraded to a release that supports urllib3 2.x, the new pin blocks installs.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants