Skip to content

Comments

feat: Rework to be neos 9 compatible#27

Open
on3iro wants to merge 1 commit intobreadlesscode:masterfrom
sandstorm:neos-9
Open

feat: Rework to be neos 9 compatible#27
on3iro wants to merge 1 commit intobreadlesscode:masterfrom
sandstorm:neos-9

Conversation

@on3iro
Copy link

@on3iro on3iro commented Jan 21, 2026

Hey @breadlesscode,

we just updated the package to be neos 9 compatible. The change is breaking - so the package will be no longer compatible with neos versions < 9.
The main change is the override of the core DocumentUriPathProjection which allows us to influence how urls are being written to the database. The projection has been copied over from core and been adjusted in all places where nodes are actively being created/changed. The easiest way to see those changes is by directly diffing our projection with the one from core.

Let me know if you have any questions or if I should make any adjustments to the code :)

@breadlesscode
Copy link
Owner

@on3iro Wow, thanks for this great work. <3

Im not into Neos anymore, maybe you want to help me maintaining this package? :)

@on3iro
Copy link
Author

on3iro commented Feb 11, 2026

@on3iro Wow, thanks for this great work. <3

Im not into Neos anymore, maybe you want to help me maintaining this package? :)

Since I mainly develop neos in company time it wouldn't really be feasible for me to maintain the package. However we did some internal talking on what could be a way forward here.
For us the easiest solution would be, to create our own fork where we maintain the Neos 9 version and point to your repository for everything below. You could then add a similar comment to your README.

Would that work for you?

(the main reason behind this, is that it makes it a lot easier for us to use the access-management of our github organization, so that all of my colleagues could work on the repo if necessary).

@breadlesscode
Copy link
Owner

Yep, that would be awesome :)

If you fork this package, can you create a PR for the readme to reference the fork?

Thanks a lot!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants