Skip to content

Add CodeRabbit config, CODEOWNERS, and SonarQube workflow#1

Merged
yilmaztayfun merged 1 commit intorelease-v0.0from
sonar
Aug 15, 2025
Merged

Add CodeRabbit config, CODEOWNERS, and SonarQube workflow#1
yilmaztayfun merged 1 commit intorelease-v0.0from
sonar

Conversation

@yilmaztayfun
Copy link
Contributor

@yilmaztayfun yilmaztayfun commented Aug 15, 2025

Introduces .coderabbit.yaml for CodeRabbit AI code review configuration, sets repository code owners in .github/CODEOWNERS, and adds a GitHub Actions workflow for SonarQube analysis on pull requests targeting master and release branches.

Summary by Sourcery

Configure automated code review and analysis by integrating CodeRabbit, setting up CODEOWNERS, and adding a SonarQube GitHub Actions workflow.

New Features:

  • Add .coderabbit.yaml to configure CodeRabbit AI for automated code reviews
  • Introduce .github/CODEOWNERS to define repository code owners
  • Add GitHub Actions workflow for SonarQube analysis on pull requests to master and release branches

Introduces .coderabbit.yaml for CodeRabbit AI code review configuration, sets repository code owners in .github/CODEOWNERS, and adds a GitHub Actions workflow for SonarQube analysis on pull requests targeting master and release branches.
@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Aug 15, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

This PR integrates CodeRabbit AI for automated code reviews, establishes repository code ownership, and adds a GitHub Actions workflow to run SonarQube analysis on pull requests against master and release branches.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Integrated CodeRabbit AI review configuration
  • Enabled multilingual review and auto-review across all branches
  • Defined include/exclude file patterns for targeted reviews
  • Configured chat settings and request-changes behavior
  • Added .NET-specific knowledge base guidelines
  • Activated early access features
.coderabbit.yaml
Added SonarQube GitHub Actions workflow
  • Set workflow trigger on pull_request for master and release branches
  • Installed JDK 17 and checked out full repository history
  • Cached SonarCloud packages and scanner binaries
  • Conditionally installed dotnet-sonarscanner on cache miss
  • Ran scanner begin, dotnet build, and scanner end steps using secrets
.github/workflows/check-sonar.yml
Established code ownership rules
  • Created CODEOWNERS file to assign default owners for all paths
.github/CODEOWNERS

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 15, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@yilmaztayfun has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 2 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c185014 and c12dfb8.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/check-sonar.yml (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch sonar

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@yilmaztayfun yilmaztayfun merged commit 3f32b5c into release-v0.0 Aug 15, 2025
1 of 3 checks passed
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @yilmaztayfun, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces foundational configuration files to enhance repository management and code quality processes. It adds a CodeRabbit AI configuration for automated code reviews and defines repository code owners. While the description mentions a SonarQube workflow, the provided patch only includes the CodeRabbit configuration and CODEOWNERS file.

Highlights

  • CodeRabbit AI Configuration: A new .coderabbit.yaml file has been added to configure CodeRabbit AI for automated code reviews. This configuration enables auto-reviews on master, main, develop, release-v*, feature/, hotfix/, and bugfix/* branches. It specifies inclusion patterns for various file types including C# (.cs, .csproj, .sln), YAML (.yml, .yaml), JSON, Markdown, PowerShell, and Shell scripts, while excluding common build artifacts and dependency directories. Custom .NET coding guidelines are also provided for the AI's knowledge base.
  • CODEOWNERS Definition: A .github/CODEOWNERS file has been introduced to define the owners for the entire repository. This file assigns ownership to @burgan-tech/code-owners and @burgan-tech/vnext-developer, ensuring that designated teams are automatically requested for review on changes.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location> `.github/workflows/check-sonar.yml:37` </location>
<code_context>
+        if: steps.cache-sonar-scanner.outputs.cache-hit != 'true'
+        shell: powershell
+        run: |
+          New-Item -Path .\.sonar\scanner -ItemType Directory
+          dotnet tool update dotnet-sonarscanner --tool-path .\.sonar\scanner
+      - name: Build and analyze
+        env:
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
Potential issue with directory creation if it already exists.

'New-Item' will fail if the directory exists. Use '-Force' or check for existence to prevent errors on reruns.
</issue_to_address>

Your trial expires on August 29, 2025. Please upgrade to continue using Sourcery ✨

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Comment on lines +37 to +38
New-Item -Path .\.sonar\scanner -ItemType Directory
dotnet tool update dotnet-sonarscanner --tool-path .\.sonar\scanner
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

issue (bug_risk): Potential issue with directory creation if it already exists.

'New-Item' will fail if the directory exists. Use '-Force' or check for existence to prevent errors on reruns.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces configuration for CodeRabbit and sets up CODEOWNERS, which is a great step towards automating code quality and ownership. My review includes a few suggestions to correct keys in the .coderabbit.yaml configuration to ensure it works as expected, and a minor formatting suggestion for both new files.

I noticed the PR title and description mention a SonarQube workflow, but the corresponding file doesn't seem to be included in the changes. Please verify if it was intended to be part of this PR.

Comment on lines +10 to +11
# Enable reviews on all branches, not just the default branch
review_status: true

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The configuration key review_status appears to be incorrect. To enable reviews, the standard key is enabled. The comment on line 10 is also slightly misleading, as branch-specific review settings are configured under auto_review.

  # Enable reviews
  enabled: true

Comment on lines +26 to +27
# Enable suggestions
enable_free_tier: true

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The configuration key enable_free_tier seems incorrect for enabling code suggestions. The correct key for this is suggestions.

  # Enable suggestions
  suggestions: true

- "Verify unit test coverage for new code"

# Early access features
early_access: true No newline at end of file

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

It's a best practice to end files with a newline character. This can prevent issues with some tools and version control systems.

early_access: true

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
# For all repo
* @burgan-tech/code-owners @burgan-tech/vnext-developer No newline at end of file

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

It's a best practice to end files with a newline character. This ensures file integrity and compatibility with various tools, especially on Unix-like systems.

*   @burgan-tech/code-owners @burgan-tech/vnext-developer

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant