Add CodeRabbit config, CODEOWNERS, and SonarQube workflow#1
Add CodeRabbit config, CODEOWNERS, and SonarQube workflow#1yilmaztayfun merged 1 commit intorelease-v0.0from
Conversation
Introduces .coderabbit.yaml for CodeRabbit AI code review configuration, sets repository code owners in .github/CODEOWNERS, and adds a GitHub Actions workflow for SonarQube analysis on pull requests targeting master and release branches.
Reviewer's GuideThis PR integrates CodeRabbit AI for automated code reviews, establishes repository code ownership, and adds a GitHub Actions workflow to run SonarQube analysis on pull requests against master and release branches. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@yilmaztayfun has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 2 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
Status, Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @yilmaztayfun, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces foundational configuration files to enhance repository management and code quality processes. It adds a CodeRabbit AI configuration for automated code reviews and defines repository code owners. While the description mentions a SonarQube workflow, the provided patch only includes the CodeRabbit configuration and CODEOWNERS file.
Highlights
- CodeRabbit AI Configuration: A new .coderabbit.yaml file has been added to configure CodeRabbit AI for automated code reviews. This configuration enables auto-reviews on master, main, develop, release-v*, feature/, hotfix/, and bugfix/* branches. It specifies inclusion patterns for various file types including C# (.cs, .csproj, .sln), YAML (.yml, .yaml), JSON, Markdown, PowerShell, and Shell scripts, while excluding common build artifacts and dependency directories. Custom .NET coding guidelines are also provided for the AI's knowledge base.
- CODEOWNERS Definition: A .github/CODEOWNERS file has been introduced to define the owners for the entire repository. This file assigns ownership to @burgan-tech/code-owners and @burgan-tech/vnext-developer, ensuring that designated teams are automatically requested for review on changes.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey there - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Individual Comments
### Comment 1
<location> `.github/workflows/check-sonar.yml:37` </location>
<code_context>
+ if: steps.cache-sonar-scanner.outputs.cache-hit != 'true'
+ shell: powershell
+ run: |
+ New-Item -Path .\.sonar\scanner -ItemType Directory
+ dotnet tool update dotnet-sonarscanner --tool-path .\.sonar\scanner
+ - name: Build and analyze
+ env:
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
Potential issue with directory creation if it already exists.
'New-Item' will fail if the directory exists. Use '-Force' or check for existence to prevent errors on reruns.
</issue_to_address>Your trial expires on August 29, 2025. Please upgrade to continue using Sourcery ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.| New-Item -Path .\.sonar\scanner -ItemType Directory | ||
| dotnet tool update dotnet-sonarscanner --tool-path .\.sonar\scanner |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue (bug_risk): Potential issue with directory creation if it already exists.
'New-Item' will fail if the directory exists. Use '-Force' or check for existence to prevent errors on reruns.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces configuration for CodeRabbit and sets up CODEOWNERS, which is a great step towards automating code quality and ownership. My review includes a few suggestions to correct keys in the .coderabbit.yaml configuration to ensure it works as expected, and a minor formatting suggestion for both new files.
I noticed the PR title and description mention a SonarQube workflow, but the corresponding file doesn't seem to be included in the changes. Please verify if it was intended to be part of this PR.
| # Enable reviews on all branches, not just the default branch | ||
| review_status: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| # Enable suggestions | ||
| enable_free_tier: true |
| - "Verify unit test coverage for new code" | ||
|
|
||
| # Early access features | ||
| early_access: true No newline at end of file |
| @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | |||
| # For all repo | |||
| * @burgan-tech/code-owners @burgan-tech/vnext-developer No newline at end of file | |||
|



Introduces .coderabbit.yaml for CodeRabbit AI code review configuration, sets repository code owners in .github/CODEOWNERS, and adds a GitHub Actions workflow for SonarQube analysis on pull requests targeting master and release branches.
Summary by Sourcery
Configure automated code review and analysis by integrating CodeRabbit, setting up CODEOWNERS, and adding a SonarQube GitHub Actions workflow.
New Features: