-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
chore: add type annotations to cloudinit.distros.parsers.hosts #6916
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
holmanb
merged 6 commits into
canonical:main
from
PhinehasNarh:fix/type-annotate-parsers-hosts
Jun 30, 2026
+27
−26
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
91a40a0
chore: add type annotations to cloudinit.distros.parsers.hosts
PhinehasNarh a2f40a0
chore: address review feedback for type annotations in hosts.py
PhinehasNarh c43a221
fix(lint): shorten comment exceeding 79-char ruff E501 limit
PhinehasNarh 3a5083f
ci: re-trigger checks
PhinehasNarh bd775be
chore: merge upstream/main to bring branch up to date
PhinehasNarh d3e5eb5
fix(mypy): use distinct variable for str(HostsConf) in test_hosts
PhinehasNarh File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there any reason this can't be
List[Tuple[str, List[str]]]?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question. The inner list can't be
List[str]becauseoptionentries store[head.split(None), tail]- that's[list[str], str], so the two elements are different types. Changing it toList[str]would make mypy flag every place we dopieces, _tail = components(it would see a list of strings being unpacked into two str variables, losing the fact thatpiecesis itself a list).List[Any]is the minimal correct annotation here without introducing a custom TypeAlias or a NamedTuple. Happy to tighten it further if you'd prefer a TypeAlias approach.