Add our product page to header#580
Open
skoech wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Sharon Koech <sharon.koech@canonical.com>
Contributor
|
So if you open [microceph.com] today it opens the documentation homepage which is good. But having the same link then in the product page makes you jump back to doc homepage when you click on the product link ? Maybe use the snapcraft landing page as the product page as MicroCeph is a snap only artefact ? opinions and discussion welcome. |
UtkarshBhatthere
requested changes
May 26, 2026
Contributor
UtkarshBhatthere
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
some things need to be cleared out.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
The docs starter pack gives us an option to include our product page in the header of of our docs site. We agreed as a team to point to microceph.com because it's more of a homepage, and it's suitable for a broader audience - including for marketing reasons, which are not satisfied by our docs site.
Type of change
How has this been tested?
Contributor checklist