Adjusted selinux policy to be more resilient to updates#5918
Merged
Conversation
In rhel-10 the current policy errored out due to missing key_socket class. Because we were specifying each class explicitly we were prone to trouble when changes happened in the kernel and selinux-policy (the package/repo which builds the .pp policy file). Replacing all of the class elements with a single all_kernel_class_perms macro will allow us to get what we want: all of the classes available for use in our policy but in a way that will change outside of our policy. Ticket: ENT-13016 Changelog: none
Contributor
Author
|
I am running a build for rhel-10 on jenkins-dev RN and will report back. |
Contributor
Author
|
Here let's check other redhats: |
larsewi
approved these changes
Oct 29, 2025
Contributor
Author
Contributor
|
Will |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In rhel-10 the current policy errored out due to missing key_socket class.
Because we were specifying each class explicitly we were prone to trouble when changes happened in the kernel and selinux-policy (the package/repo which builds the .pp policy file).
Replacing all of the class elements with a single all_kernel_class_perms macro will allow us to get what we want: all of the classes available for use in our policy but in a way that will change outside of our policy.
Ticket: ENT-13016
Changelog: none