example(policy): New json-field-validator policy example#2328
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
DCO check is failed, please make sure you signoff your commits, thanks! |
Signed-off-by: Daniel Liszka <daniel@chainloop.dev>
Member
|
Thanks, Do you want the json policy to be present just in an example or moved upstream to chainloop platform? |
migmartri
approved these changes
Aug 11, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds a comprehensive JSON field validation policy example with shared testing utilities and improved policy structure.
Changes
New Policy Example
json-field-validator/: Complete policy example for validating JSON fieldsapplication.name,security.enabled)Enhanced Testing Framework
_testutils.sh: Configurable test utilities supporting multiple material types--kindparameter)Additional Improvements
sbom-freshness/: Restructured SBOM policy following new templatePolicy Features
required_field=application.name expected_value=web-servicerequired_field=version field_pattern="^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+$"field_value()andfield_exists()helpersTesting
# All policies tested and working ./json-field-validator/test.sh ./sbom-freshness/test.sh