Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Feature/generalized auralization #83
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: engd_project_2026
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Feature/generalized auralization #83
Changes from all commits
edc4091af92d8c6c214024d1c19f9cfc19c5f87fd72fdaebde49784129ad43f335aa73658b89349347e72f7bdd664961c2bbc8e0ac48f87cFile filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To me it seems that all if this can be removed by uncommenting this code line here
backend/app/services/executors/local_executor.py
Line 191 in c48f87c
So I would propose to revert this part.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To me it seems that all if this can be removed by uncommenting this code line here
backend/app/services/executors/local_executor.py
Line 191 in c48f87c
So I would propose to revert this part.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a conceptual comment here:
Why does the RIR get normalized by default?
This removes for example any distance information in the auralization and source strength differences. Not sure if that's something that makes a lot of sense as default.
Maybe we can implement something like a normalize checkbox for the auralization in the future instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm.. we need the normalisation because DG, for instance, returns crazy-large pressure values. This is a good comment though. We probably want to have a pressure to signal function (does pyfar have that?).
Regarding the changes you suggest, wouldn't the pf.dsp.normalize function return NaN if imp_tot is None because rir consists of zeros?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll add some comments, but will leave the functionality as is, alright? :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this can be reverted when using the remove functionality of the executor class
backend/app/services/executors/local_executor.py
Line 191 in c48f87c
So I would propose to revert this part.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if this can be reverted as well when using the remove option in the executor
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.