Skip to content

ci: add Codex PR auto-review (homelab fleet rollout)#7

Merged
chrisbaker2000 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/add-codex-review
Jun 23, 2026
Merged

ci: add Codex PR auto-review (homelab fleet rollout)#7
chrisbaker2000 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/add-codex-review

Conversation

@chrisbaker2000

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Adds Codex PR auto-review to this repo as part of the homelab fleet rollout — the same mechanism already running on openclaw-homelab. On each PR a GitHub Action runs OpenAI Codex (read-only sandbox) against a Claude-Code-optimized rubric and posts a structured review comment (verdict + file:line findings + severity + confidence + embedded JSON). Non-blocking by design.

Files added:

  • .github/workflows/codex-review.yml — review workflow (pinned action + CLI + model gpt-5.5, effort: xhigh).
  • .github/codex/rubric.md — homelab-generic rubric (Claude-Code-consumer optimized; secret-hygiene + operational-safety first).
  • .github/codex/rubric.schema.json — strict output schema.

Required follow-up (review is inert until then)

Needs the repo Actions secret OPENAI_CODEX_REVIEW_KEY (dedicated OpenAI key). Until set, the codex step soft-fails (continue-on-error) and posts a non-blocking "did not produce a review" comment.


Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01A2mPyA6bLEBRQCA4aYZY9k

Adds the Codex review workflow + generic homelab rubric + output schema,
matching openclaw-homelab. Requires the OPENAI_CODEX_REVIEW_KEY repo secret
to activate (soft-fails until then).

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01A2mPyA6bLEBRQCA4aYZY9k
@chrisbaker2000
chrisbaker2000 merged commit e9523c0 into main Jun 23, 2026
@chrisbaker2000
chrisbaker2000 deleted the chore/add-codex-review branch June 23, 2026 12:57
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Codex Review — failed

Codex did not produce a review for commit 2ffbad9. Outcome: failure. See workflow run.

Failure of this optional review is non-blocking and does not gate merging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant