initial draft changes for addressing lack of functionality in from_existing_graph#7
initial draft changes for addressing lack of functionality in from_existing_graph#7cole-st-john wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…g_graph for deeper support of geometry, properties/attributes, etc
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
|
@ghillebrand : This is just a start at addressing #4, and it unfortunately prompts some breaking changes to make development more sustainable. But please take a look and see if this is might help. |
|
Hi, Skimming through the commit, personally, I prefer camelCase to snake_case, so all those changes I like - but don't impact me., since I use your system in a very API-like manner! I will at some point want to support higraphs, where Nodes are sets, and edges are n-ary. The nodes-as-sets seems very close to the yEd I also want to implement Hermite splines for edges, rather than Bezier, since I find the manipulation more intuitive and direct. yEd only implements Bezier (even their So ultimately, I am very happy with your direction, and with any comments you may have on how to handle those things that I don't think yEd does. Thank you for your time on this! Grant |
|
@cole-st-john Hi,
I have added a PR #8 to put in the name parameter into your tests, which would possibly highlight this. It is how I am using it. Thanks |

In response to #4
Draft breaking changes to make the repo more functional around supporting both to and from graph usages.