Publication List: Add paper 10.1049/cdt2.12051#171
Merged
Conversation
Member
|
Congratulations on that paper! Given that the list is prefixed by "The following publications, in reverse chronological order, have used or cited Fidimag:", I would say, it should be added. |
Collaborator
|
Hi Mark, yes, go ahead. I'm afraid we are not updating the publications list enough these days, since tracking the citing papers is difficult. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Not a pull request in the traditional sense, but a question as to whether or not this paper should be added to fidimag's publication list (I do not want to forcibly merge into a project I have not committed to in almost a decade).
The paper explores an alternative compute architecture for numerical modelling. In the long term, I would like to write a fidimag-adapter so one could export their fidimag simulation to this architecture for deployment. Development is very much ongoing...
The reason I raise the question is because, unlike the other papers in that list, it purely uses Fidimag as a sensible comparator. It is also very much not a paper about magnetism in condensed matter.
Thoughts?