schedule: added unified schedule config struct

[jkellerer]

Draft for schedule structs discussed in #80

# defaults in global section
global:
  systemd-drop-in-files:
    - "default-drop-in.conf"

  schedule-defaults:
    log: /path/to/default-schedule.log
    lock-wait: 60m

# inline or schedule structure type config in profile command sections
default:
  systemd-drop-in-files:
    - "profile-operrides.conf"

  # inline
  check:
    schedule:
      - weekly
    schedule-log: /path/to/check.log

  # schedule structure
  backup:
    schedule:
      at: "daily"
      log: /path/to/backup-schedule.log
      lock-wait: 30m

.. and finally group support (in this PR, it is config only. Also needs updates to scheduling (partially done in #290), coming later):

version = 2

groups:
  all:
    profiles: "*"
    schedules:
      backup:
        at: "daily"
        log: /path/to/backup-schedule.log
        lock-wait: 30m

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.38902% with 42 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 70.50%. Comparing base (5fad1cb) to head (9a46c4c).

Files	Patch %	Lines
commands.go	33.33%	14 Missing ⚠️
config/mocks/PropertyInfo.go	48.00%	10 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
config/config.go	79.41%	4 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
config/jsonschema/schema.go	84.21%	1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
config/schedule.go	98.49%	2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
config/profile.go	92.59%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #333      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.96%   70.50%   +0.54%     
==========================================
  Files         118      119       +1     
  Lines       11923    12176     +253     
==========================================
+ Hits         8341     8584     +243     
- Misses       3193     3196       +3     
- Partials      389      396       +7     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	70.50% <90.39%> (+0.54%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jkellerer]

@creativeprojects , think it is ready now. had it running on one of my machines and schedules work like before (had them recreated to use run-schedule).

[creativeprojects]

I looked at the MR and so far it all looks good to me.
I'm going to play with it on some of my configs and see how it goes 👍🏻

Oh BTW I forgot to mention I think we have no way of displaying a group configuration: the <profile>.show command only works with profiles 🤔 we could add the feature later though

[jkellerer]

Thanks for checking!

[creativeprojects]

It works fine 😛

Thank you for the great work 😉

I think we can merge it and I'll install it on more instances for good measure

[jkellerer]

Had already began refactoring #290 to allow scheduling groups. That is the only remaining part.