Revert "[feat]: Surface deletionTimestamp as a printcolumn"#708
Merged
Conversation
jonasz-lasut
requested review from
erhancagirici,
sergenyalcin and
ulucinar
as code owners
July 16, 2026 09:13
Signed-off-by: Jonasz Łasut-Balcerzak <jonasz@upbound.io>
jonasz-lasut
force-pushed
the
revert-514-main
branch
from
July 16, 2026 09:14
0ad6cc6 to
27caa28
Compare
erhancagirici
approved these changes
Jul 16, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reverts #514
Objections raised:
column isn't a common CR convention.
Ready status (True/False) but not the reason, the Ready condition/reason is a better lifecycle signal than a dedicated column.
Long term proposal is to introduce
crd_typestemplate similarly as with controller and setup templates