chore(config): enable pr-agent in the review pipeline, drop retired gemini#110
Conversation
…emini The pilot (#104) added the reviewer workflow but left enabled_bots untouched, so PR-Agent reviews would be posted and never ingested. Adds pr-agent so the finalize pipeline files them as pr-comment findings under bot_kind: pr-agent. Gemini goes in the same edit: its consumer tier was retired 2026-07-17, so the entry only made finalize wait for a bot that can never post. Net bot count is unchanged, so the wait budget does not grow. Matches plan-marshall and TokenSheriff. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry @cuioss-oliver, you have reached your weekly rate limit of 500000 diff characters.
Please try again later or upgrade to continue using Sourcery
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited based on label configuration. 🚫 Review skipped — only excluded labels are configured. (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: cuioss/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
One-line follow-up to #104. The pilot added the reviewer workflow but left
enabled_botsuntouched, so PR-Agent reviews would have been posted and never ingested into the findings pipeline.Gemini goes in the same edit: its consumer tier was retired 2026-07-17, so that entry only made finalize wait for a bot that can never post. Net bot count is unchanged, so the wait budget doesn't grow. The
standards/gemini.mdregistry doc stays, so a historical Gemini comment still classifies correctly.Now matches plan-marshall and TokenSheriff.
Labelled
skip-bot-review— no reviewer value in a one-line config change.