Skip to content

feat(deps)!: support zero 1.7#263

Open
Gerbuuun wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/zero-v1.7
Open

feat(deps)!: support zero 1.7#263
Gerbuuun wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
codex/zero-v1.7

Conversation

@Gerbuuun

@Gerbuuun Gerbuuun commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • bump @rocicorp/zero to ^1.7.0
  • update VueView to use the returned applyChange root and transaction-scoped copy-on-write state
  • register the transaction commit callback needed by Zero 1.7

Tests

  • pnpm vitest run src/view.test.ts
  • pnpm build
  • pnpm test:types
  • pnpm lint

@socket-security

socket-security Bot commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Updated@​rocicorp/​zero@​1.6.2 ⏵ 1.7.07110091 +6100 +1100
Addedvitest@​4.1.10981007999100
Added@​vitest/​coverage-v8@​4.1.10991007999100
Updated@​antfu/​eslint-config@​9.0.0 ⏵ 9.1.096 -110010091 -3100
Updatedeslint@​10.5.0 ⏵ 10.6.098 +110010095100

View full report

@socket-security

socket-security Bot commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review the following alerts detected in dependencies.

According to your organization's Security Policy, it is recommended to resolve "Warn" alerts. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Action Severity Alert  (click "▶" to expand/collapse)
Warn High
Obfuscated code: npm eslint-plugin-jsdoc is 90.0% likely obfuscated

Confidence: 0.90

Location: Package overview

From: pnpm-lock.yamlnpm/@antfu/eslint-config@9.1.0npm/eslint-plugin-jsdoc@63.0.12

ℹ Read more on: This package | This alert | What is obfuscated code?

Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support@socket.dev.

Suggestion: Packages should not obfuscate their code. Consider not using packages with obfuscated code.

Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only in this pull request, reply with the comment @SocketSecurity ignore npm/eslint-plugin-jsdoc@63.0.12. You can also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all. To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to change the triage state of this alert.

Warn High
Obfuscated code: npm rimraf is 90.0% likely obfuscated

Confidence: 0.90

Location: Package overview

From: pnpm-lock.yamlnpm/@rocicorp/zero@1.7.0npm/rimraf@5.0.10

ℹ Read more on: This package | This alert | What is obfuscated code?

Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support@socket.dev.

Suggestion: Packages should not obfuscate their code. Consider not using packages with obfuscated code.

Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only in this pull request, reply with the comment @SocketSecurity ignore npm/rimraf@5.0.10. You can also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all. To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to change the triage state of this alert.

View full report

@Gerbuuun Gerbuuun requested a review from danielroe July 7, 2026 13:22
@Gerbuuun

Gerbuuun commented Jul 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

The fixture tests failed because of mismatching vitest installs. I'm not sure if we need to run the fixtures on CI but I added it separately and ignored them in unit tests

@Gerbuuun Gerbuuun changed the title feat(deps): support zero 1.7 feat(deps)!: support zero 1.7 Jul 8, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant