Fix repeated control fields being dropped #79
Performance Regression: -10.46%
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 59 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 16 skipped benchmarks1
⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | WallTime | test_pipeline_parallel_2x_10k_threaded |
44.8 ms | 50 ms | -10.46% |
Comparing bd-7dre-repeated-control-fields (6f120ea) with main (4de08b6)2
Footnotes
-
16 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
-
No successful run was found on
main(6f120ea) during the generation of this report, so 4de08b6 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩