Skip to content

Comments

fix(sbom): use cache instead of generate SBOM#38

Open
reyreavman wants to merge 2 commits intofix/sbom/several-werf-yaml-should-workfrom
feat/sbom/use-cache-instead-of-generate-sbom
Open

fix(sbom): use cache instead of generate SBOM#38
reyreavman wants to merge 2 commits intofix/sbom/several-werf-yaml-should-workfrom
feat/sbom/use-cache-instead-of-generate-sbom

Conversation

@reyreavman
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Radmir Khurum <radmir.khurum@flant.com>
@nervgh nervgh changed the base branch from main to fix/sbom/several-werf-yaml-should-work February 20, 2026 08:09
}
data, err := json.Marshal(bom)

stable := stableBOMContent{
Copy link
Collaborator

@nervgh nervgh Feb 20, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we prefer inclusion over exclusion? What are the reasons?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i started from the idea that we need to clearly control the list of fields that are involved in calculating the checksums
the inclusion list approach seems more explicit to me

Signed-off-by: Radmir Khurum <radmir.khurum@flant.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants