Skip to content

fix: Use newer TypedDict to allow generic typed dict #30

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
kylebarron merged 1 commit into from
May 21, 2025
Merged

fix: Use newer TypedDict to allow generic typed dict #30

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 10 additions & 2 deletions src/obspec/_list.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,10 +1,18 @@
from __future__ import annotations

import sys
from collections.abc import Sequence
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Generic, Protocol, TypedDict, TypeVar
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Generic, Protocol, TypeVar

# Note: we need to use the typing-extensions typed dict because we also parametrize over
# a generic
# https://stackoverflow.com/a/79300271
if sys.version_info >= (3, 11):
from typing import TypedDict
else:
from typing_extensions import TypedDict

if TYPE_CHECKING:
import sys
from collections.abc import Sequence

from ._meta import ObjectMeta
Expand Down
Loading