An MCP server that triangulates customer support tickets and feature requests to help PMs decide what to build next.
Real results: Analyzed 2,370 signals (2,136 support tickets + 234 feature requests) across 3 products in 55 seconds. Identified 16 themes, 15 convergent. Top priority: Booking & Scheduling (score: 134.6) — 629 tickets + 77 feature requests pointing at the same problem.
Read the full story: I built an MCP server that changed how I prioritize products — why I built this, how convergent signals work in practice, and what I learned building with Claude Code.
- Signal triangulation — Not just data access. Matches support tickets against feature requests to find convergent themes, then scores them with a weighted formula that gives convergent signals a 2x priority boost.
- Composability — Designed to work with other MCP servers. Pass churn data from Metabase or traffic trends from Google Analytics into
generate_product_planviakpi_context, and the methodology adjusts priorities accordingly. - PM methodology built in — Opinionated scoring based on 7 years of real product management across 9 products and 1M+ users. Not a generic framework — an actual decision-making process exposed as an MCP resource.
- PII scrubbing — Customer data never reaches the LLM unfiltered. SSNs, credit cards (Luhn-validated), emails, and phone numbers are redacted before analysis. Agent responses are filtered out of quotes.
graph TD
A[Claude Desktop / Code] -->|stdio| B[pm-copilot]
A -->|stdio| C[Metabase MCP]
A -->|stdio| D[Google Analytics MCP]
B -->|Qualitative| E[HelpScout: tickets]
B -->|Qualitative| F[ProductLift: feature requests]
C -->|Quantitative| G[Conversion, Churn, Revenue]
D -->|Acquisition| H[Traffic, Channels, Trends]
B -.->|kpi_context| A
Claude orchestrates multiple MCP servers. PM Copilot handles qualitative customer signals. Other servers provide quantitative business metrics. The kpi_context parameter is the integration point — no point-to-point integrations required.
git clone https://github.com/dkships/pm-copilot.git
cd pm-copilot
npm install
cp .env.example .env # Edit with your credentials
npm run buildAdd to ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pm-copilot": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/pm-copilot/dist/index.js"]
}
}
}claude mcp add pm-copilot -- node /absolute/path/to/pm-copilot/dist/index.jsOr use the .mcp.json already in the project root — Claude Code picks it up automatically.
Cross-references HelpScout tickets and ProductLift feature requests, returns theme-matched analysis with priority scores.
| Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
timeframe_days |
number | 30 | Days to look back (1-90) |
top_voted_limit |
number | 50 | Max feature requests by vote count |
mailbox_id |
string | — | HelpScout mailbox filter (raw ID) |
mailbox_name |
string | — | HelpScout mailbox name (case-insensitive); auto-resolved to an ID. Run list_sources to see names |
portal_name |
string | — | ProductLift portal filter |
detail_level |
string | "summary" |
"summary", "standard", or "full". Output size scales with data volume — for one 30-day mailbox, roughly 15KB / 60KB / 360KB |
Returns themes sorted by priority score, each with reactive/proactive counts, convergence flag, evidence summaries, and representative customer quotes.
Builds a prioritized product plan with evidence and customer quotes. Accepts external business metrics via kpi_context.
| Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
timeframe_days |
number | 30 | Days to look back (1-90) |
top_voted_limit |
number | 50 | Max feature requests by vote count |
mailbox_id |
string | — | HelpScout mailbox filter (raw ID) |
mailbox_name |
string | — | HelpScout mailbox name (case-insensitive); auto-resolved to an ID. Run list_sources to see names |
portal_name |
string | — | ProductLift portal filter |
kpi_context |
string | — | Business metrics from other MCP servers |
max_priorities |
number | 5 | Number of priorities to return (1-10) |
preview_only |
boolean | false | Audit mode: show what data would be sent |
detail_level |
string | "summary" |
"summary", "standard", or "full". Output size scales with data volume — for one 30-day mailbox, roughly 5KB / 21KB / 375KB |
format |
string | "json" |
"json" (structured, composable) or "markdown" (ready-to-read product brief) |
Raw ProductLift data access for browsing feature requests directly. Each request includes its
public url.
| Parameter | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
portal_name |
string | — | Filter to a specific portal |
include_comments |
boolean | true | Include comments on each request |
status |
string | — | Filter to requests with this status (case-insensitive), e.g. open, planned, completed |
Lists the data sources the server is connected to — HelpScout mailboxes (id + name) and
ProductLift portals (name + url) — so you can discover the names to pass to mailbox_name /
portal_name. Read-only; never returns API keys or customer data. Takes no parameters.
A trimmed synthesize_feedback response at the default summary detail level. Values are illustrative; note the PII scrubbing applied to the customer quote.
{
"timeframe_days": 30,
"detail_level": "summary",
"portal_name": "all",
"fetched_at": "2026-06-01T16:00:00.000Z",
"pii_scrubbing_applied": true,
"pii_categories_redacted": ["email", "phone"],
"analysis": {
"total_data_points": 612,
"reactive_count": 548,
"proactive_count": 64,
"themes": [
{
"theme_id": "booking-scheduling",
"label": "Booking & Scheduling",
"category": "Core Product",
"priority_score": 87.1,
"convergent": true,
"signal_type": "convergent",
"reactive_count": 211,
"proactive_count": 19,
"evidence_summary": "230 signals (211 tickets, 19 requests). Convergent across both sources.",
"representative_quotes": [
"[Support ticket] \"Double-booked slots again after the timezone change — reach me at [EMAIL REDACTED]\"",
"[Feature request, 47 votes] \"Let me block buffer time between meetings\""
]
},
{
"theme_id": "billing-payment",
"label": "Billing & Payment",
"category": "Monetization",
"priority_score": 64.3,
"convergent": false,
"signal_type": "reactive",
"reactive_count": 188,
"proactive_count": 0,
"evidence_summary": "188 signals (188 tickets, 0 requests). Reactive only.",
"representative_quotes": [
"[Support ticket] \"Charged twice for the annual plan\""
]
}
],
"emerging_themes": [
{ "pattern": "csv export", "frequency": 12 }
],
"unmatched_count": 38
}
}PM Copilot is designed to work alongside other MCP servers. Here's a worked example showing how a kpi_context override changes the ranking. Numbers are illustrative.
Step 1: The PM asks a single question
Pull our churn and booking completion data, then use pm-copilot to create a product plan using all of that context.
Step 2: pm-copilot analyzes the signals and returns the top priorities
| # | Theme | Score | Tickets | Feature Requests | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Billing & Payment | 91.1 | 2,336 | 20 | Convergent |
| 2 | Booking & Scheduling | 87.1 | 682 | 74 | Convergent |
| 3 | Account & Licensing | 69.7 | 1,955 | 8 | Convergent |
| 4 | Team & Collaboration | 64.4 | 1,875 | 19 | Convergent |
| 5 | Whitelabel & Branding | 50.2 | 92 | 30 | Convergent |
Step 3: Business metrics from dashboards arrive as kpi_context
Product A: booking completion rate dropped from 74% to 66% over last
30 days. Monthly churn increased from 3.1% to 4.2%. Organic traffic
up 22% MoM. Product B: document completion rate steady at 81%.
Churn flat at 2.8%.
Step 4: Claude synthesizes both, and overrides the formula
The scores say Billing & Payment is #1. But the methodology says churn data overrides the formula. With Product A's booking completion dropping 8 points and churn spiking 35%, Booking & Scheduling becomes the real #1 — it's the core product breaking.
Product B deprioritized (stable metrics, no fire). Product A's 22% organic traffic growth elevates Whitelabel & Branding as a growth play.
The server provides the signal ranking. KPI context provides the override judgment. Claude synthesizes both.
PM Copilot exposes a pm-copilot://methodology resource — David Kelly's product planning framework, built over 7 years of launching 9 products to 1M+ users.
Key principles:
- The 5% rule — You complete ~5% of what customers ask for each month. The framework identifies which 5% matters most.
- Convergent signals always win — Same theme in both support tickets AND feature requests = highest confidence signal.
- Reactive > proactive — Broken stuff drives churn. You can survive not having a feature; you can't survive errors.
- Business metrics override the formula — Rising churn, dropping conversion, or revenue impact can change everything.
The methodology is versioned (v2.0) and served as markdown content via the MCP resource protocol. Claude references it automatically when using generate_product_plan.
Customer data flows through PM Copilot on its way to Claude. All text is scrubbed before it enters the analysis pipeline or leaves the server.
| Category | Method | Replacement |
|---|---|---|
| SSNs | Pattern match (XXX-XX-XXXX) |
[SSN REDACTED] |
| Credit cards | 13-19 digit sequences + Luhn validation | [CC REDACTED] |
| Email addresses | Standard email pattern | [EMAIL REDACTED] |
| Phone numbers | US formats (+1, parens, dashes, dots) | [PHONE REDACTED] |
| Customer email field | Always redacted | [REDACTED] |
| Data | Why |
|---|---|
| Agent/admin responses | Only customer voice matters; agent replies could leak internal process |
| Internal HelpScout notes | May contain credentials, workarounds, internal discussions |
| Attachments | Could contain screenshots with PII, invoices, medical documents |
| Voter identities | Vote counts are sufficient; individual identity adds no PM value |
preview_only: trueongenerate_product_planshows what data would be sent without fetching it- Every response includes
pii_scrubbing_appliedandpii_categories_redactedmetadata - Data categories logged to stderr on each call (categories only, never content)
npm install # Install dependencies
npm run build # Compile TypeScript
npm run dev # Watch mode
npm start # Run the server
npm test # Run the test suiteCall a tool in isolation without restarting your MCP client — useful for iterating on changes and for checking response sizes:
npm run build
npm run tool -- --list
npm run tool -- list_sources '{}'
npm run tool -- get_feature_requests '{"portal_name":"<your-portal>","status":"open"}'The runner prints the byte size of each response. Output may include your configured source names/URLs (and PII-scrubbed customer text) — redact before sharing.
themes.config.json in the project root defines what themes to look for. Edit without rebuilding — loaded at runtime.
Ships with 16 data-driven themes across 9 categories. Add your own by appending to the themes array. Unmatched data points are analyzed for emerging patterns using bigram/trigram frequency detection.
priority = (frequency × 0.35 + severity × 0.35 + vote_momentum × 0.30) × convergence_boost
- Frequency (0.35): Count of data points, normalized across themes
- Severity (0.35): Reactive signals only — thread depth, recency (7-day half-life decay), tag boosts
- Vote momentum (0.30): Proactive signals only — 80% votes + 20% comments
- Convergence (2x): Applied when a theme has both reactive and proactive signals
- Changes aren't taking effect. The MCP client runs the compiled
dist/. After editing source, runnpm run buildand restart the client (or the MCP server connection) to pick up new code. No HelpScout mailbox named "…". Runlist_sourcesto see the exact mailbox names, or pass the numericmailbox_iddirectly.No portal found with name "…"/ portal missing. The portal must be configured inPRODUCTLIFT_PORTALS(or the single-portal env vars). Runlist_sourcesto see configured portals.
- Fork the repository
- Create a feature branch (
git checkout -b feature/your-feature) - Ensure
npm run buildsucceeds with no errors - Follow existing patterns: tools use
registerTool, API clients get their own module, PII scrubbing happens at the format layer - Open a pull request