Skip to content

docs: register the two hook-entry pipelines in the signal inventory#281

Merged
tieubao merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs/register-intake-pipeline
Jul 20, 2026
Merged

docs: register the two hook-entry pipelines in the signal inventory#281
tieubao merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
docs/register-intake-pipeline

Conversation

@tieubao

@tieubao tieubao commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What

Registers intake-sweep (merged in #279) and backlog-stage in docs/verification/signal-pipeline-inventory.md as rows 20-21, and updates SPEC-200's count + appendix to match.

Why

SPEC-200 cites that inventory as its evidence base for "the kit has one ETL class with five vocabularies". intake-sweep is a pipeline of exactly that shape (collect -> propose a ## [staged] block) and was missing. Registering it surfaced that backlog-stage, its older sibling and the other hook-entry pipeline feeding the same staging file, was never listed either: the original 2026-07-14 sweep enumerated CLI entries and had a blind spot for hook entries. The header now records that so the next sweep does not repeat it.

Test

tests/test-meta.sh 0 FAIL, tests/test-intake-sweep.sh 19/19. Docs-only change; no count is pinned by any test (checked), so the 19 -> 21 update is prose-consistent rather than gate-enforced.

intake-sweep is a signal pipeline in exactly the SPEC-200 sense (collect ->
propose a staging block) but was absent from the inventory that spec cites as
its evidence base. Registering it surfaced that backlog-stage, its direct
sibling and the older of the two, was never listed either: the original sweep
enumerated CLI entries and missed hook-entry pipelines.

Both are now rows 20-21, the staging-block proposal list reads 2/5/15/20/21,
and the header records why the first sweep had the blind spot.
@tieubao
tieubao merged commit b399c79 into master Jul 20, 2026
2 checks passed
@tieubao
tieubao deleted the docs/register-intake-pipeline branch July 20, 2026 10:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant