Skip to content

Conversation

@RolandJentschETAS
Copy link
Contributor

The software architecture checklists in the freedom from interference area of the ISO26262 is reworked for clearer understanding of the checkpoints.

@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

Copy link
Contributor

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see inline comments

-
a) the usage of shared resources (cpu time, shared memory, ...) are checked in a way that freedom from interference between the processes is ensured,
b) check if the operating system supports freedom from interference between the processes
Check lso if the operating system supports freedom from interference between the processes.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Check Iso" ?

Copy link
Contributor

@aschemmel-tech aschemmel-tech Jan 28, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As you changed this to "also" I now understand you want the "Acceptance criteria" and the "Guidance" answered. This is not what is intended by these two columns. "Guidance" shall explain how the "Acceptance criteria" can be reached / answered. This is now not fully fulfilled: Missing is: How ensure cpu time FFI? How ensure shared memory FFI? How do I make sure I completed the task (what is meant with ...)? I do not think this guidance will fit into the column - please create this as part of the https://eclipse-score.github.io/process_description/pr-539/process_areas/architecture_design/guidance/architecture_guideline.html

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants