Skip to content

[Siteplan] e2e testing#2126

Open
mariusheine wants to merge 19 commits intomainfrom
siteplan-e2e-testing
Open

[Siteplan] e2e testing#2126
mariusheine wants to merge 19 commits intomainfrom
siteplan-e2e-testing

Conversation

@mariusheine
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 13, 2026

Test Results

131 tests  ±0   131 ✅ ±0   31s ⏱️ -4s
 31 suites ±0     0 💤 ±0 
 31 files   ±0     0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 33fcd65. ± Comparison against base commit d276991.

This pull request removes 9 and adds 9 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[1] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@68868328
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[2] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@544e8149
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[3] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@f6de586
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[4] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@7c847072
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[5] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@23f86d8a
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[1] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@795faad, expected=multi/container-id/2025652936/element-id]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[2] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@69f3e556, expected=multi/456/1206258545/123]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[1] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@99c3cee, second=other], expected=multi/container-id/1482010861/element-id/other=other]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[2] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@60ab895f, second=xxx], expected=multi/456/1097632693/123/other=xxx]
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[1] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@38eb0f4d
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[2] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@74ea46e2
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[3] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@77bb48d5
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[4] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@12d5c30e
org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest ‑ testGetPathsDigraphPP(TestGetPathsDigraphPP)[5] org.eclipse.set.basis.graph.DigraphsTest$TestGetPathsDigraphPP@26586b74
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[1] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@210d3a42, expected=multi/container-id/213063852/element-id]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKey(TestData)[2] TestData [input=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@6f4adaab, expected=multi/456/1978560393/123]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[1] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Weichen_und_Gleissperren.impl.W_Kr_Gsp_ElementImpl@75bf9e67, second=other], expected=multi/container-id/679137498/element-id/other=other]
org.eclipse.set.ppmodel.extensions.utils.CacheUtilsTest ‑ testGetCacheKeyOther(TestData)[2] TestData [input=Pair [first=org.eclipse.set.model.planpro.Signale.impl.SignalImpl@45c408a4, second=xxx], expected=multi/456/444700929/123/other=xxx]

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@mariusheine mariusheine marked this pull request as draft January 14, 2026 07:18
@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@TruongQuangSB
Copy link
Contributor

/license-check

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@mariusheine mariusheine marked this pull request as ready for review January 28, 2026 09:12
- name: Eslint
run: cd web/textviewer && npm run lint

test-siteplan:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mariusheine i think, we should make own workflow for all testing, also swtbot and this

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TruongQuangSB Yeah good idea. I will adjust the workflows

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2026

License summary

❌ Not yet vetted dependencies:

Dependency License Status Ticket
p2/orbit/p2.eclipse.plugin/org.junit_3.8.2.v200706111738.nl_de/4.26.0.v20230220105658 unknown restricted none
  • Committers can request a license review via by commenting /request-license-review.
  • After all reviews have concluded, Committers can re-run the license-vetting check by commenting /license-check

Workflow run (with attached summary files):
https://github.com/eclipse-set/set/actions/runs/21666911331

workflows: ["Build SET"]
types: [completed]
branches:
- '*'
Copy link
Contributor

@TruongQuangSB TruongQuangSB Feb 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mariusheine Did you already test this Workflow on your fork ? I think this workflow should be triggered by "Build SET" workflow. When trigger by "Build SET" completed, then it can't take correct the artifact for test.
Otherweise should this Workflow only execute by main, normal PR and update package.json in siteplan

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@TruongQuangSB No I have not tested it by now. I wanted to trigger it only on completed because otherwise the SET build was not successful.

Copy link
Contributor

@TruongQuangSB TruongQuangSB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

see comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants