Skip to content

ci: use D:\ drive for Windows CI runners#1917

Open
erickzhao wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
ci/windows-d-drive-speedup
Open

ci: use D:\ drive for Windows CI runners#1917
erickzhao wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
ci/windows-d-drive-speedup

Conversation

@erickzhao
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@erickzhao erickzhao commented May 5, 2026

Summary

ref electron/forge#4038

  • Redirect YARN_GLOBAL_FOLDER and TEMP to the faster D:\ scratch disk on GitHub Actions Windows runners
  • Applied to both build.yml and test.yml workflows
  • Matches the approach already used in Electron Forge

Test plan

  • Verify Windows CI jobs pass on this PR
  • Confirm no regression on macOS/Linux jobs (step is gated with if: runner.os == 'Windows')

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Redirect YARN_GLOBAL_FOLDER and TEMP to the faster D:\ scratch disk
on GitHub Actions Windows runners, matching the approach used in Forge.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <svc-devxp-claude@slack-corp.com>
@erickzhao erickzhao requested review from a team and codebytere as code owners May 5, 2026 16:39
@erickzhao erickzhao marked this pull request as draft May 5, 2026 16:40
@erickzhao erickzhao changed the title build: use D:\ drive for Windows CI runners ci: use D:\ drive for Windows CI runners May 5, 2026
@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Status

coverage: 88.447%. remained the same — ci/windows-d-drive-speedup into main

@erickzhao erickzhao marked this pull request as ready for review May 5, 2026 16:54
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@dsanders11 dsanders11 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unclear if this actually helps our situation here as the build times aren't markedly different, but doesn't hurt to give this a try.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants