perf: avoid normal port use scheduler polling.#105
Draft
qzhuyan wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
Author
|
Author
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
since OTP21 , beam use epoll and have separate thread(s) to call the epoll.
https://www.erlang.org/blog/io-polling/
these threads can be scaled up and pollset could be scaled as well.
however, the ports will be 'upgraded' to the scheduler polling epoll set. (ERTS_POLL_USE_SCHEDULER_POLLING) if it is active and be epoll ready for 10 times.
This patch bump 10 to 999 times.
Another workaround is to have lower
active_nfor network ports, e.g. {active, 10}.