Skip to content

feat: rfc for supporting tables in excalidraw #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
ad1992 wants to merge 16 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: rfc for supporting tables in excalidraw #1

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
bdeb4b3
feat: rfc for supporting tables in excalidraw
ad1992 Jul 13, 2024
cac1ad4
add missing details
ad1992 Jul 13, 2024
5c2ba88
update rfcs with more details
ad1992 Jul 13, 2024
fd5bd54
remove tableId as its not needed rn
ad1992 Jul 13, 2024
423a7eb
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into aakansha/tables
ad1992 Jul 15, 2024
9210ee5
add virtual cell elements alternative approach
ad1992 Jul 15, 2024
55182b4
tweak RFC
ad1992 Jul 15, 2024
cccd166
add alternate approach to ease reordering of rows/columns
ad1992 Jul 17, 2024
3ba9c82
add order ad timestamp to resolve conflicts
ad1992 Jul 17, 2024
5b4f16e
add lastUpdated
ad1992 Jul 17, 2024
38deb78
rename order to index
ad1992 Jul 17, 2024
a5cf5be
remove trailing quotes
ad1992 Jul 17, 2024
8b02bee
update the rfc with the latest structure and updates
ad1992 Aug 1, 2024
a864537
uplift width and height to respective column and row attributes
ad1992 Aug 2, 2024
256f318
use for each row/column and cell and combine with top level versionN…
ad1992 Aug 2, 2024
31d7c7e
fix typos
ad1992 Aug 2, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion 0000-template.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Add examples to explain the approach as well.

Why should we _not_ do this? Please consider:

- implementation cost, both in term of code size and complexity
- implementation cost, both in terms of code size and complexity
- whether the proposed feature can be implemented in user space
- the impact on the NPM Package API
- integration of this feature with other existing and planned features
Expand Down
Loading