Skip to content

fix: Update CodeRabbit config#446

Open
DaveSkender wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
fix/coderabbit-inheritance
Open

fix: Update CodeRabbit config#446
DaveSkender wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
fix/coderabbit-inheritance

Conversation

@DaveSkender
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Updates .coderabbit.yaml to properly participate in the facioquo org inheritance model.

Changes

  • Set inheritance: true (was false) — now inherits org baseline from facioquo/coderabbit
  • Removed issue_enrichment block — inherited from org, which already has agentic-planning label configured
  • Removed all review settings that duplicate org defaults (profile, booleans, auto_review, finishing_touches, pre_merge_checks, chat)
  • Retained Python-specific deltas: ruff: enabled: true, extended path_filters, path_instructions, auto_title_instructions, knowledge_base.code_guidelines.filePatterns

Closes the stale rabbit-plan label reference (label was already renamed on GitHub in a prior batch update).

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 9, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 9ac312e6-0719-4155-82cb-6018c2ddef9e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9dba6b4 and f892f04.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The .coderabbit.yaml was restructured: top-level inheritance set to true and prior top-level keys removed. The reviews section was simplified by deleting many workflow options and controls, modifying reviews.path_filters to add an exclusion for !.github/workflows/*.lock.yml, and reducing reviews.tools to only enable ruff. The top-level chat config was removed. knowledge_base was trimmed to keep opt_out, web_search.enabled, and code_guidelines.filePatterns only.

✨ Finishing Touches
✨ Simplify code
  • Create PR with simplified code
  • Commit simplified code in branch fix/coderabbit-inheritance

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Around line 68-73: The filePatterns under knowledge_base -> code_guidelines
currently reference non-existent files ("**/agents.md",
".github/copilot-instructions.md", ".github/instructions/**/*.instructions.md");
either add the missing guideline files (create agents.md in appropriate repo
locations, create .github/copilot-instructions.md, and add one or more
.instructions.md files under .github/instructions/) or update the filePatterns
entry to match existing guideline filenames in the repo (modify the filePatterns
array to point to actual filenames or glob patterns used in your project) so
CodeRabbit can locate and load the coding guidelines.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 35465f38-1c2d-4e86-9b70-e5044eec7ad2

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0f6ef14 and 9dba6b4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml

@DaveSkender DaveSkender changed the title fix: Update CodeRabbit config to use org inheritance model fix: Update CodeRabbit config Apr 9, 2026
Signed-off-by: Dave Skender <8432125+DaveSkender@users.noreply.github.com>
@DaveSkender DaveSkender enabled auto-merge (squash) April 9, 2026 21:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant