🧪 Add unit tests for format_security_list#70
Conversation
Added unit tests to cover `format_security_list` including scenarios with an empty list, single entries with variations of set fields (ref, ref+tag, ref+tag+timestamp), and lists with multiple elements. Co-authored-by: ffalcinelli <1167082+ffalcinelli@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
🎯 What: Added unit tests for
format_security_listinsrc/config.rs.📊 Coverage: The tests now cover all key scenarios:
[])reference,tag,timestamp)✨ Result: Enhanced the test suite coverage and verified correct handling of
format_security_listoutput formatting, improving overall codebase reliability.PR created automatically by Jules for task 10680917875961530029 started by @ffalcinelli