Fix a self-contradicting microSD spec and a dead Rockchip wiki link - #427
Open
munzzyy wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Fix a self-contradicting microSD spec and a dead Rockchip wiki link#427munzzyy wants to merge 1 commit into
munzzyy wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Signed-off-by: munzzyy <Munzzyy1@proton.me>
munzzyy
force-pushed
the
fix-microsd-spec-and-dead-link
branch
from
July 27, 2026 18:57
91ab396 to
cbee165
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Two unrelated accuracy fixes I hit while reading through the hardware pages.
microSD spec contradicts itself inside one file.
Tech-Specs.mdstates the slot spec twice. Under Ports it's asserted flat out, under Memory and storage it carries the "needs verification" warning:- **MicroSD card slot:** supports UHS-I SDR104- **MicroSD card slot:** ⚠️ (UHS-I SDR104 — needs verification)No other page mentions microSD, so there's nothing to break the tie. I matched line 66 to the cautious version rather than the confident one, since dropping a caveat needs evidence it's been resolved and I don't have that. If the slot has since been verified, the fix is the other direction and I'm happy to flip it.
Dead Rockchip wiki link.
RK3576-Boot-flow.mdlinks toopensource.rock-chips.com/wiki_Boot_option. That domain doesn't resolve any more — it CNAMEs toopensource.rock-chips.com.qtlgslb.com., which returns NXDOMAIN from both Cloudflare and Google DoH, so it's the zone being gone rather than one resolver being unhappy. There's no Wayback snapshot to point at either.The sentence is still worth keeping, since it's warning people off the obsolete
miniloader/idbloaderterminology, so I left the text and just removed the link.One thing I couldn't settle, flagging rather than guessing:
Power-subsystem.md:21says the battery is 22.9 Wh andTech-Specs.md:115says 24000 mWh. Same 2-cell pack. I can't tell which is canonical from the repo alone, so I left both alone — happy to send a follow-up once someone confirms the real number.