Skip to content

UIREQ-1352: Fixed CSV export issue when searching by title#1358

Merged
Dmitriy-Litvinenko merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
UIREQ-1352
Mar 9, 2026
Merged

UIREQ-1352: Fixed CSV export issue when searching by title#1358
Dmitriy-Litvinenko merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
UIREQ-1352

Conversation

@Dmitriy-Litvinenko
Copy link
Contributor

@Dmitriy-Litvinenko Dmitriy-Litvinenko commented Mar 6, 2026

Purpose

Fixed CSV export issue when searching by title
Search strings for CSV report obsolete and should be the same as we use for search bar.

Refs

https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/UIREQ-1352

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2026

Jest Unit Test Results

    1 files  ±0     66 suites  ±0   1m 40s ⏱️ -7s
  889 tests +7    889 ✅ +7  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
1 251 runs  +7  1 251 ✅ +7  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 775a590. ± Comparison against base commit f071ae0.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Mar 6, 2026

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
9.3% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@Dmitriy-Litvinenko Dmitriy-Litvinenko requested a review from a team March 6, 2026 16:24
Copy link
Member

@zburke zburke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code LGTM but nowhere in the ticket or the PR body is there any description of what the actual problem is or how this change addresses it. It looks like there are two bugs:

  1. item.title should be instance.title
  2. vastly different search strings used across different routes when they should all be the same

Is that correct? If so, whew, I understood correctly 😄; please update the PR description to confirm this. If not, uhhhh, I guess I have misunderstood 😕; please update the PR description and explain what I missed.

** Ugh, will keeping this module's core code in a directory named deprecated ever be addressed? It was supposed to be a "temporary" fix according to #1224, but it has never been addressed.

@Dmitriy-Litvinenko Dmitriy-Litvinenko requested a review from a team March 9, 2026 12:25
@Dmitriy-Litvinenko Dmitriy-Litvinenko merged commit ca32d93 into master Mar 9, 2026
14 of 15 checks passed
@Dmitriy-Litvinenko Dmitriy-Litvinenko deleted the UIREQ-1352 branch March 9, 2026 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants