Clarify delim parameter in add_resource()#298
Merged
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #298 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 23 23
Lines 670 672 +2
=========================================
+ Hits 670 672 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
PietrH
marked this pull request as ready for review
June 15, 2026 09:23
peterdesmet
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix #204
I've attempted to clarify the
delimbehavior inadd_resource(), especially that it doesn't affectwrite_package(). When callingdevtools::document()I updated a bunch of other function documentation. So I suppose that needed doing anyway!Please feel free to change my wording!
We could also refer to a details section, and go into details there.