Skip to content

fix(#45): tighten review verdict criteria for medium findings#49

Open
fullsend-ai-coder[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
agent/45-fix-review-verdict-consistency
Open

fix(#45): tighten review verdict criteria for medium findings#49
fullsend-ai-coder[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
agent/45-fix-review-verdict-consistency

Conversation

@fullsend-ai-coder

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Replace the subjective "multiple medium-severity findings which could affect the intended outcome" criterion with an objective rule: two or more medium findings, at least one identifying a functional bug, require request-changes.

Add a self-consistency check to the pr-review synthesis step: if the summary text states findings should be addressed before merge, the verdict must be request-changes, not comment.

Update comment-only criteria to clarify it applies only to stylistic, advisory, or process-related medium findings.

Changes:

  • agents/review.md: Outcome section verdict criteria
  • skills/pr-review/SKILL.md: Step 6f verdict logic and
    self-consistency check

Note: pre-commit could not run (shellcheck-py failed to install due to sandbox network restrictions). Secret scan passed.


Closes #45

Post-script verification

  • Branch is not main/master (agent/45-fix-review-verdict-consistency)
  • Secret scan passed (gitleaks — 2540ede96537b32447321564bec60226efca120e..HEAD)
  • Pre-commit hooks passed (authoritative run on runner)
  • Tests ran inside sandbox

Replace the subjective "multiple medium-severity findings which
could affect the intended outcome" criterion with an objective
rule: two or more medium findings, at least one identifying a
functional bug, require request-changes.

Add a self-consistency check to the pr-review synthesis step:
if the summary text states findings should be addressed before
merge, the verdict must be request-changes, not comment.

Update comment-only criteria to clarify it applies only to
stylistic, advisory, or process-related medium findings.

Changes:
- agents/review.md: Outcome section verdict criteria
- skills/pr-review/SKILL.md: Step 6f verdict logic and
  self-consistency check

Note: pre-commit could not run (shellcheck-py failed to
install due to sandbox network restrictions). Secret scan
passed.

Closes #45
@fullsend-ai-coder fullsend-ai-coder Bot requested a review from a team as a code owner July 7, 2026 22:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Review agent verdict contradicted its own analysis on PR #32: chose comment despite saying findings should be addressed before merge

0 participants