Skip to content

docs(readme): Railway deployment status 2026-04-27 — fleet 100/101/102 + P0 corpus blocker (gHashTag/trios#143)#34

Open
gHashTag wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-railway-status-2026-04-27
Open

docs(readme): Railway deployment status 2026-04-27 — fleet 100/101/102 + P0 corpus blocker (gHashTag/trios#143)#34
gHashTag wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-railway-status-2026-04-27

Conversation

@gHashTag
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Update README — Railway deployment status (2026-04-27)

Refs: gHashTag/trios#143 · companion comment: issuecomment-4324652513

What

Adds a new top-level section ## Railway Deployment Status (2026-04-27) immediately above ## License. The section documents:

  • Live 3-seed cloud fleet trios-train-seed-100/101/102 deployed to Railway project IGLA (e4fe33bb-3b09-4842-9782-7d2dea1abc9b), env production, all SUCCESS.
  • The R5-honest Gate-2 verdict: NOT DONE because the training corpus (data/tinyshakespeare.txt) is missing from ghcr.io/ghashtag/trios-trainer-igla:latest and containers fall through to a synthetic fallback yielding val_bpb=0.0000 (degenerate, not a valid R7 ledger row).
  • Three pre-registered follow-up issues (P0 corpus blocker, P1 tri.rs infra mismatch, P2 stale fleet cleanup).

Why

  • Anchors the public state of the cloud fleet for trios#143 to the main@ee7771f7 E2E test.
  • Surfaces the P0 blocker so it can't be silently merged-around: train_loop.rs currently does silent fallback on missing corpus, which violates R5 honesty. The README now states this so the next PR (P0 fix) has clear context.

R5 / R7 / R9 status

  • R5 honesty: README explicitly states 0/3 valid Gate-2 rows on this fleet, no DONE-claim.
  • R7 triplet: not affected — emit logic is unchanged in this PR (docs-only).
  • R9 embargo: not affected.

Falsification

  • If the corpus is later baked into the image (P0 fix), this section can be amended (or kept as historical 2026-04-27 snapshot) by a follow-up PR.

Diff

  • README.md: +35 lines (1 new section), no other lines touched. Docs-only PR.

Acceptance

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant