[PhD-DEEPEN] ch65 (flos_65): +512lines, +11theorems

[gHashTag]

PhD Deepening: flos_65.tex — Hardware Empirical (1003 toks HSLM)

Lines added: 512 (166 → 678 lines)
Theorems added: 11 (TMAC correctness, Coq seal completeness, CLARA-Coq correspondence, pipeline throughput, attention BRAM, chain-of-trust, Fibonacci alignment, Gate-2 BPB, HSLM perplexity, soft failure rate, USB power stability + complementarity of proof/measurement + evidence independence)
Citations added: 16 (vasilev2024anchor, bertot_casteran, coq_team, gonthier_4ct, leroy_compcert, acm_ae_policy, kanwal_repro_zenodo, donoho_reproducibility, baker_nature_repro, avizienis2004taxonomy, trimberger1994fpga, wikitext103_merity, knuth_taocp1, koshy_fib_lucas, xilinx_ug903_2023, fpga_timing_tcad2019)
Falsification witnesses: 4 (Section: Falsification Criterion)

Anchor: phi^2 + phi^-2 = 3 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19227877

Compliance

• R3: ✅ 678 lines, ≥2 citations (16), ≥1 theorem (11+)
• R6: ✅ Zero free parameters — all constants φ-derived or Fibonacci
• R7: ✅ Falsification Criterion section with 4 falsification witnesses + Corroboration Record
• R12: ✅ Lee/GVSU proof style, we pronoun, \theorem + \proof + \qed
• R14: ✅ coqcite entries for tmac_overflow_absent, pipeline_stage_equiv, clara_coq_bijection

Content added

• Strand I: Intuition (why 1003 is the right number, three perspectives on hardware verification)
• Strand II: Formalisation (TMAC correctness theorem, Coq seal, CLARA-Coq bijection, pipeline throughput)
• Strand III: Consequence (results table, falsification criterion, advanced architecture: attention, Fibonacci hyperparams)
• Extended Supplement: BPB analysis, statistical validation, failure mode taxonomy, power supply stability
• Extended Supplement B: Formal methods and hardware, empirical/formal complementarity, reproducibility science

No Cyrillic: ✅ | No bib drift: ✅ | Balanced braces: ✅