Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @darsoo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly improves the flexibility of the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request expands the remove_drug_batch function to accept any atomic vector, not just character vectors. The changes are well-implemented, with corresponding updates to documentation and the addition of relevant test cases. I've identified one minor opportunity for improvement to make the code more concise by removing a redundant type conversion. Overall, this is a good enhancement to the function's usability.
| drug_vec <- as.character(drug_vec) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am aware that sub() performs implicit coercion, but I added the explicit as.character() call intentionally to improve workflow transparency. It makes the type conversion explicit for anyone reading the code, ensuring that the expected data format is clear before it hits the regex logic.
Description
What changed?
Expanded the functionality of the remove_drug_batch function to support various input types. Previously, the function strictly required a character vector. It now accepts any atomic vector (e.g., integer, numeric) while ensuring the output remains consistent by performing an explicit conversion to the character class.
Related JIRA issue: GDR-3282
Checklist for sustainable code base
Logistic checklist
›