Clarify task and bounty submission flow#93
Conversation
|
@jarlyn2025 is attempting to deploy a commit to the gibwork Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Note
Copilot was unable to run its full agentic suite in this review.
Updates the landing-page content to reflect new example work items and expands the FAQ to better explain bounties/tasks, payments, and acceptable proof submissions.
Changes:
- Refreshed “looking for” work items (titles and reward amounts).
- Expanded FAQ answers for bounty vs task and payment flow.
- Added a new FAQ entry describing what proof to submit.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| components/looking-for.tsx | Updates sample task titles and USDC reward amounts displayed in the “looking for” section. |
| components/faq.tsx | Improves FAQ clarity and adds a new “proof to submit” question/answer. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
|
Local verification for the current head commit
This PR adds a second concrete landing-page improvement for the 350 USDC Gibwork task by making task examples current, linked, and easier to verify. |
Summary
Why
The landing page should help first-time contributors understand what work looks like on Gibwork before they open the app. This change replaces stale sample work with current examples and makes the proof/submission path concrete.
Validation
Notes
The visible Vercel status is blocked by the Gibwork team's deployment authorization handoff, not by the local build.