Export and refactor har.Logger.Entries#311
Conversation
har/entrylist.go
Outdated
| func (el *EntryList) Lock() { | ||
| el.lock.Lock() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (el *EntryList) Unlock() { | ||
| el.lock.Unlock() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why do we need to expose the lock/unlock out of the EntryList struct? The functions on EntryList can work with el.lock directly
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So the thought was that if someone wanted to create a particular variant of a har file - for example, someone wanted all hars that had a URL of "*.google.com" - they would need to be able to iterate the list. Without the lock being exposed that would end up non goroutine safe.
However, my problem may very well be that my brain is still stuck at times in "ruby mode" where one can sort of stick their toe in and out of an object/struct as they please. I'm thinking the better option to handle my thought process would be for a container interface that one could implement in any way they wished outside of martian. That would allow for the locks to be unexported because the internal implementation would be solely for the purposes of martian itself and if one wanted the "*.google.com" concept they would implement a new container interface and set the logger to use that.
In fact nothing would need to be exported from martian but rather if martian allowed the container interface implementation to be set then the caller would have complete control of the container outside of martian.
Would your preference be to close this pull or to rework within this request?
Thanks for your patience on this......
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I decided to just add another commit to this pull request because the difference was not that much upon adding an interface.
wishdev
force-pushed
the
export_har_entries
branch
from
32c92a5 to
becf132
Compare
2 participants
I would like to be able to pull out a single har entry from the har.Logger without it being exported to json first. In order to accomplish this - I've exported the har.Logger.Entries field and I refactored the field to utilize a standard container/list as opposed to a custom double linked list. I believe this will help utilizes the Entries field better without the need to know what the underlying container is.
For example, if one wanted to add a function to export a single har file then it is easier to call RemoveEntry than it is to code against the customize double linked list.
Tests are included for the new sruct