Skip to content

Chore: bump deps#2472

Open
tolzhabayev wants to merge 6 commits intomainfrom
chore/bump-deps
Open

Chore: bump deps#2472
tolzhabayev wants to merge 6 commits intomainfrom
chore/bump-deps

Conversation

@tolzhabayev
Copy link
Collaborator

@tolzhabayev tolzhabayev commented Feb 19, 2026

Updating some dependencies:

  • vite
  • qs
  • files-changed workflow

I cant really bump tar as lerna gets weird and nx command gets lost (nx: command not found). Also it seems like its peer dependencies are not yet fully up to date so maybe it makes to sense to bump lerna yet anyway.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 19, 2026

Hello! 👋 This repository uses Auto for releasing packages using PR labels.

✨ This PR can be merged. It will not be considered when calculating future versions of the npm packages and will not appear in the changelogs.

@tolzhabayev tolzhabayev self-assigned this Feb 19, 2026
@tolzhabayev tolzhabayev added the no-changelog Don't include in changelog and version calculations label Feb 19, 2026
@tolzhabayev tolzhabayev changed the title Chore/bump deps Chore: bump deps Feb 19, 2026
@tolzhabayev tolzhabayev marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2026 11:30
@tolzhabayev tolzhabayev requested a review from a team as a code owner February 19, 2026 11:30
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 19, 2026 11:30
@tolzhabayev tolzhabayev requested a review from a team as a code owner February 19, 2026 11:30
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates a few dependencies and related references across the repo.

Changes:

  • Bump express in plugin-docs-cli
  • Remove the root webpack-dev-server override
  • Update plugin metadata docs and pin a newer tj-actions/changed-files commit

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
packages/plugin-docs-cli/package.json Bumps express dependency version.
package.json Removes the overrides entry for webpack-dev-server.
docusaurus/docs/reference/metadata.md Updates wording/allowed values description for category.
.github/actions/change-detection/action.yml Pins tj-actions/changed-files to a newer commit (v47.0.4).

@grafana-plugins-platform-bot grafana-plugins-platform-bot bot moved this from 📬 Triage to 🔬 In review in Grafana Catalog Team Feb 19, 2026
Copy link
Collaborator

@mckn mckn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good but I have not tested it locally. Any more details on why we don't need the webpack-dev-server override anymore?

| **buildMode** | `string` | The build mode of the plugin. This field is set automatically at build time, so it should not be provided manually.<br/> | |
| **builtIn** | `boolean` | [internal only] Indicates whether the plugin is developed and shipped as part of Grafana. Also known as a 'core plugin'.<br/> | |
| **category** | `string` | Plugin category used on the Add data source page.<br/>Possible values are: `"tsdb"`, `"logging"`, `"cloud"`, `"tracing"`, `"profiling"`, `"sql"`, `"enterprise"`, `"iot"`, `"other"`<br/> | |
| **category** | `string` | Plugin category used on the Add new connection page. Can be one from the list: "tsdb", "logging", "cloud", "tracing", "profiling", "sql", "enterprise", "iot", "other", empty string or custom string<br/> | |
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this change be part of this PR? I'm happy to keep it just a bit confusing that it lives in a bump deps PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

no-changelog Don't include in changelog and version calculations

Projects

Status: 🔬 In review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants