Clarify pr-checks.yml workflow behavior - no changes needed

[Copilot]

Review feedback suggested the PR validation workflow needed changes to handle non-conventional commit titles. Analysis shows the workflow already handles this correctly.

Current Behavior

The pr-checks.yml workflow (lines 19-20) treats conventional commits format violations as warnings, not errors:

if (!/^(feat|fix|docs|style|refactor|test|chore|perf|ci|build|revert)(\(.+\))?:/.test(pr.title)) {
  warnings.push('⚠️ PR title should follow conventional commits format');
}

• PRs with non-conventional titles receive a warning comment
• Workflow check passes (not blocked)
• Only actual errors (title too short, missing description) fail the check

Resolution

No workflow changes required. The existing implementation already provides the permissive behavior needed. PR authors can optionally update titles to clear warnings (e.g., "docs: update README.md"), but this is not enforced.

---

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

[Copilot]

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.