Skip to content

chore: migrate CODEOWNERS to new component team (26Q2)#12

Merged
mattwang44 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
chore/codeowners-26q2
Apr 30, 2026
Merged

chore: migrate CODEOWNERS to new component team (26Q2)#12
mattwang44 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
chore/codeowners-26q2

Conversation

@yehzu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@yehzu yehzu commented Apr 24, 2026

Auto-generated CODEOWNERS migration for 26Q2 team reorganization.

Replaces legacy scrum team references with the new component team assignment, or adds a catch-all if none existed.

See the org-level migration plan for full context.

@yehzu yehzu requested a review from a team as a code owner April 24, 2026 10:54
Comment thread .github/CODEOWNERS Outdated
Copilot AI requested a review from mattwang44 April 30, 2026 02:08
@mattwang44 mattwang44 merged commit 9ea3bf5 into main Apr 30, 2026
1 check passed
@gitvelocity-reviewer
Copy link
Copy Markdown

📊 Code Quality Score: 1/100

Base Score 5 × ESF 0.1x = 0.5, floored to minimum of 1

Category Score Factors
🔭 Scope 2/20 Single CODEOWNERS file, pure configuration, no subsystems or logic touched
🏗️ Architecture 0/20 No architectural impact; GitHub metadata file only
⚙️ Implementation 1/20 Trivial text edit: consolidating two lines into one, replacing one team handle
⚠️ Risk 1/20 Minimal risk; changes code review notification targets only; easily reversible
✅ Quality 1/15 No tests applicable; change is self-explanatory; no documentation needed
🔒 Perf / Security 0/5 No performance or security considerations for CODEOWNERS change

Scored by GitVelocity · How are scores calculated?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants