chore: bump version to 3.2.10

[sunilgattupalle]

Summary

• Bump package.json version to 3.2.10 ahead of the next release tag.

Test plan

• CI passes (build, test, typecheck, docs:check)

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[cursor]

Checked PR #603 for inline review comments to address — none found.

What I looked for:

• Pull request review comments (/pulls/603/comments): 0
• Review threads (GraphQL): 0 unresolved threads
• PR reviews: none submitted yet

This PR only bumps package.json version from 3.2.9 to 3.2.10. No code changes were made.

I'll re-run when inline review feedback is posted on the diff.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Autofix PR review comments}

[cursor]

PR Risk Assessment: Very Low (re-evaluated after update)

Decision: Existing approval retained — no reviewer assignment required.

Trigger

PR was updated (synchronize) after the initial approval. A second commit (99d5f886) synced manifest versions and updated the release-metadata test.

Evidence (diff-based)

Signal	Finding
Files changed	4 (package.json, manifest.json, mcp-directory/manifest.json, tests/release-metadata.test.ts)
Lines changed	+4 / −4
Production logic	None — version fields only (3.2.9 → 3.2.10)
Test changes	release-metadata.test.ts expectation updated to match synced versions
Infra / auth / security	No impact
Blast radius	None

Re-approval analysis

The new commit adds manifest version sync and a matching test assertion update. These are mechanical release-metadata changes with no behavioral, operational, or security surface change. Risk did not increase from the prior Very Low classification.

Per decision rules: approval is retained; no re-approval posted.

Actions taken

• ✅ Re-evaluated — risk remains Very Low
• ✅ Existing approval retained (risk unchanged)
• ⏭️ No reviewers assigned (not required)
• ℹ️ No CODEOWNERS file in repository

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}