Release v0.7.0

[harumiWeb]

#99 を実装完了したのでPYPIにリリースします。

---

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • First-class workbook editing API and public CLI commands: patch, make, ops, validate
  • Dry-run → inspect → apply workflow and improved CLI usability

• Bug Fixes

  • Fixed request-sheet fallback precedence and compatibility-layer override behavior
  • Improved failure-path handling for workbook file operations

• Documentation

  • Updated release notes, README, and architecture guidance for canonical editing workflows

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: be76ca83-c946-4d33-8b1f-470804418f52

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a083bf6 and ee3d44f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/release-notes/v0.7.0.md

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• docs/release-notes/v0.7.0.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Release documentation and metadata for v0.7.0: added release notes and changelog entry for first-class workbook editing API under exstruct.edit, new exstruct CLI subcommands, maintainer docs clarifying MCP as an integration layer, bumped package version, and consolidated task/verification notes. No runtime code changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Release Documentation CHANGELOG.md, docs/release-notes/v0.7.0.md	Added v0.7.0 release entry describing exstruct.edit editing API, new CLI subcommands (patch, make, ops, validate), canonical layering (core vs MCP), highlights, fixes, and next steps.
Version & Site Nav pyproject.toml, mkdocs.yml	Bumped package version to 0.7.0 and added release-notes/v0.7.0.md to MkDocs navigation.
Architecture Docs dev-docs/architecture/overview.md	Added guidance that MCP compatibility shims should use live module lookup for legacy monkeypatches and that override precedence must be validated at the public compatibility entrypoint.
Task Records tasks/feature_spec.md, tasks/todo.md	Replaced historical feature logs with a v0.7.0 release closeout record and simplified verification steps; removed prior phase-by-phase session history and consolidated checks.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• docs: complete issue #99 phase 4 canonical usage docs #106 — Overlapping documentation updates for issue #99, aligning exstruct.edit positioning and CLI/MCP guidance.
• Clean up internal docs and task logs #97 — Related doc reorganizations touching tasks/feature_spec.md, tasks/todo.md, and dev-docs architecture notes.

Poem

🐰 I hopped through changelogs, tidy and neat,
New edits, CLI steps, and docs now complete.
exstruct.edit hums with workbook delight,
Version 0.7.0 gleams in the night. ✨📚

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The pull request description does not follow the required template structure, missing key sections like Summary, Acceptance Criteria, and Validation checklist.	Update the PR description to follow the provided template, including Summary with scope/motivation and issue link, Acceptance Criteria checklist, and Validation steps.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The pull request title clearly and accurately summarizes the main change: a release of version 0.7.0.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch release/v0.7.0

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[devin-ai-integration]

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no potential bugs to report.

View in Devin Review to see 1 additional finding.