Skip to content

PEG-2848: Merge dev/PEG-2848-R14-merge2 into team/PEG-2848-R14#341

Open
vmuthuhm wants to merge 22 commits into
team/PEG-2848-R14from
dev/PEG-2848-R14-merge2
Open

PEG-2848: Merge dev/PEG-2848-R14-merge2 into team/PEG-2848-R14#341
vmuthuhm wants to merge 22 commits into
team/PEG-2848-R14from
dev/PEG-2848-R14-merge2

Conversation

@vmuthuhm

@vmuthuhm vmuthuhm commented Jun 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Rebase of dev/PEG-2848-R14-merge2 onto release/26.14
  • Merge rebased changes from dev/PEG-2848-R14-merge2 into team/PEG-2848-R14
  • Resolved pom.xml version conflicts by keeping release/26.14 versions

Test plan

  • Verify CI pipeline passes
  • Confirm pom.xml versions align with release/26.14 baseline

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

aykutdanisman and others added 22 commits May 19, 2026 16:22
* CCT-2353 - openspec files archived

* CCT-2353 - openspec files archived
* PEG-2848 Testing Framework-D improvement

* PEG-2848 Testing Framework-D improvement

* Update pom.xml
…Framework D changes

- Restore processReplay, sendPostalNotification(5-arg), courtDocumentMetadata, startDate in getFutureHearings
  to release-engg-2609 versions of DefendantsAddedToCourtProceedingsProcessor, PostalService,
  NotificationService, ListingService (PEG-2848 had removed these; they must be kept from base)
- Apply Framework D (JsonObjects.createObjectBuilder) on restored sources
- Fix ListingStub: update setupListingAnyAllocationQuery/setupListingAnyFutureAllocationQuery to 3/4-arg
  signatures matching release-engg-2609
- Fix HearingNotificationHelperTest: restore full release-engg-2609 version + Framework D changes
- Fix InitiateCourtApplicationProceedingsCommandApiTest: add linkType STANDALONE to buildEnvelope

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vmuthuhm vmuthuhm requested a review from a team as a code owner June 1, 2026 19:19
@vmuthuhm vmuthuhm requested review from gergelykisshmcts, jayenhc and rkakumanuhmcts and removed request for a team June 1, 2026 19:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants