Adding subnet method for Ipv6 objects#81
Open
SJCaldwell wants to merge 4 commits intoipaddress-gem:masterfrom
Open
Adding subnet method for Ipv6 objects#81SJCaldwell wants to merge 4 commits intoipaddress-gem:masterfrom
SJCaldwell wants to merge 4 commits intoipaddress-gem:masterfrom
Conversation
Author
|
Is this repository still being maintained? |
|
Not very actively it would appear |
@watzon I have forked this gem to https://github.com/ipaddress2-gem/ipaddress_2 and it has subnet support for IPv6 as well as a single link_local :-) |
I saw that. My only interest in this project was actually as inspiration for my Crystal library which is almost a 1 for 1 port of this gem. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added support for ipv6 subnetting. Seems all the pieces to do it were already written, so I really just wrote the test and switched out the pieces of the ipv4 subnetting code for ipv6. I was expecting to have to write more code, so I'm wondering if maybe not including IPV6 subnetting is intentional?