Modified code lines not built - even when there are changes

[akash-manna-sky]

Modified code lines not built - even when there are changes

Fixes #633

Testing done

Submitter checklist

• Make sure you are opening from a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side) and not your main branch!
• Ensure that the pull request title represents the desired changelog entry
• Please describe what you did
• Link to relevant issues in GitHub or Jira
• Link to relevant pull requests, esp. upstream and downstream changes
• Ensure you have provided tests that demonstrate the feature works or the issue is fixed

[github-actions]

☀️   Quality Monitor

Tests

     Unit Tests: ✅ successful — 189 passed
   🚀   Integration Tests: ✅ successful — 149 passed, 7 skipped
   ⛔   Architecture Tests: ✅ successful — 15 passed

Coverage for New Code

   〰️   Line Coverage: 76.92% — 3 missed lines
   ➰   Branch Coverage: 100.00% — perfect 🎉

Coverage for Whole Project

   〰️   Line Coverage: 76.28% — 729 missed lines
   ➰   Branch Coverage: 66.86% — 292 missed branches

Style

     CheckStyle: No warnings
     PMD: No warnings
   ☕   Java Compiler: No warnings

Bugs

     SpotBugs: No bugs
   🐛   Error Prone: No bugs

Vulnerabilities

   🛡️   OWASP Dependency Check: 229 vulnerabilities — error: 18, high: 63, normal: 140, low: 8

Software Metrics

   🌀   Cyclomatic Complexity: 1032 (total)
   💭   Cognitive Complexity: 568 (total)
   ➿   N-Path Complexity: 1389 (total)
   📏   Lines of Code: 12065 (total)
   📝   Non Commenting Source Statements: 4069 (total)
   🔗   Class Cohesion: 100.00% (maximum)
   ⚖️   Weight of Class: 100.00% (maximum)

🚦 Quality Gates

Overall Status: ❗ UNSTABLE

✅ Passed Gates

• ✅ Overall Tests Success Rate: 100.00 >= 100.00
• ✅ Branch Coverage in New Code: 100.00 >= 90.00
• ✅ Potential Bugs in Whole Project: 0.00 <= 0.00
• ✅ Style Violation in Whole Project: 0.00 <= 0.00

❌ Failed Gates

• ❌ Line Coverage in New Code: 76.92 >= 90.00

---

Created by Quality Monitor v4.10.0 (#6745abb). More details are shown in the GitHub Checks Result.

[akash-manna-sky]

Can you please review this PR? @uhafner