Skip to content

Bump the python-packages group across 1 directory with 10 updates#68

Open
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/pip/python-packages-aea9a915ed
Open

Bump the python-packages group across 1 directory with 10 updates#68
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
dependabot/pip/python-packages-aea9a915ed

Conversation

@dependabot

@dependabot dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Oct 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore <dependency name> major version will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency's major version (unless you unignore this specific dependency's major version or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore <dependency name> minor version will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency's minor version (unless you unignore this specific dependency's minor version or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore <dependency name> will close this group update PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for the specific dependency (unless you unignore this specific dependency or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot unignore <dependency name> will remove all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot unignore <dependency name> <ignore condition> will remove the ignore condition of the specified dependency and ignore conditions

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: black
  dependency-version: 25.9.0
  dependency-type: direct:production
  dependency-group: python-packages
- dependency-name: flake8
  dependency-version: 7.3.0
  dependency-type: direct:production
  dependency-group: python-packages
- dependency-name: isort
  dependency-version: 6.1.0
  dependency-type: direct:production
  dependency-group: python-packages
- dependency-name: ipython
  dependency-version: 9.6.0
  dependency-type: direct:production
  dependency-group: python-packages
- dependency-name: pillow
  dependency-version: 11.3.0
  dependency-type: direct:production
  dependency-group: python-packages
- dependency-name: pipenv
  dependency-version: 2025.0.4
  dependency-type: direct:production
  dependency-group: python-packages
- dependency-name: pyautogen
  dependency-version: 0.10.0
  dependency-type: direct:production
  dependency-group: python-packages
- dependency-name: pycodestyle
  dependency-version: 2.14.0
  dependency-type: direct:production
  dependency-group: python-packages
- dependency-name: pylint
  dependency-version: 3.3.9
  dependency-type: direct:production
  dependency-group: python-packages
- dependency-name: virtualenv
  dependency-version: 20.34.0
  dependency-type: direct:production
  dependency-group: python-packages
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file python Pull requests that update Python code labels Oct 6, 2025
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 6, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:
  • ✅ 0 vulnerable package(s)
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
  • ⚠️ 3 package(s) with unknown licenses.
See the Details below.

License Issues

requirements.txt

PackageVersionLicenseIssue Type
flake8~> 7.3.0NullUnknown License
pillow~> 11.3.0NullUnknown License
pycodestyle~> 2.14.0NullUnknown License

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
pip/black ~> 25.9.0 🟢 6.7
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 9Found 25/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Maintained🟢 1027 commit(s) and 10 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Fuzzing🟢 10project is fuzzed
Signed-Releases⚠️ 0Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Packaging🟢 10packaging workflow detected
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
pip/flake8 ~> 7.3.0 🟢 5.6
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review⚠️ 1Found 2/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Maintained🟢 1013 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
License🟢 9license file detected
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
pip/ipython ~> 9.6.0 🟢 5.2
Details
CheckScoreReason
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Code-Review🟢 5Found 3/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Security-Policy🟢 9security policy file detected
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 2badge detected: InProgress
License🟢 10license file detected
Fuzzing🟢 10project is fuzzed
Signed-Releases⚠️ 0Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities⚠️ 011 existing vulnerabilities detected
pip/isort ~> 6.1.0 🟢 4.9
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 9Found 12/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Maintained🟢 45 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 8binaries present in source code
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Packaging🟢 10packaging workflow detected
Branch-Protection⚠️ 1branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
pip/pillow ~> 11.3.0 🟢 6.8
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 9Found 17/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 23 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Token-Permissions🟢 10GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
CII-Best-Practices🟢 5badge detected: Passing
License🟢 9license file detected
Fuzzing🟢 10project is fuzzed
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Packaging🟢 10packaging workflow detected
Vulnerabilities⚠️ 013 existing vulnerabilities detected
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Branch-Protection⚠️ 0branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
pip/pipenv ~> 2025.0.4 🟢 4.5
Details
CheckScoreReason
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Code-Review🟢 3Found 2/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Packaging🟢 10packaging workflow detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 3binaries present in source code
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities⚠️ 010 existing vulnerabilities detected
pip/pyautogen ~> 0.10.0 UnknownUnknown
pip/pycodestyle ~> 2.14.0 🟢 5.5
Details
CheckScoreReason
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Code-Review🟢 7Found 7/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Maintained🟢 1013 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
License🟢 9license file detected
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
pip/pylint ~> 3.3.9 🟢 7.8
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 19 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Security-Policy🟢 9security policy file detected
License🟢 10license file detected
CII-Best-Practices🟢 5badge detected: Passing
Token-Permissions🟢 9detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Signed-Releases🟢 85 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
Branch-Protection🟢 8branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
Packaging🟢 10packaging workflow detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities🟢 37 existing vulnerabilities detected
SAST🟢 10SAST tool is run on all commits
pip/virtualenv ~> 20.34.0 🟢 5.8
Details
CheckScoreReason
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Code-Review🟢 7Found 15/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Binary-Artifacts🟢 5binaries present in source code
License🟢 10license file detected
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection🟢 4branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
Packaging🟢 10packaging workflow detected
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0

Scanned Files

  • requirements.txt

@dependabot @github

dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Oct 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot recreate.

2 similar comments
@dependabot @github

dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Oct 30, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot recreate.

@dependabot @github

dependabot Bot commented on behalf of github Nov 17, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Dependabot tried to update this pull request, but something went wrong. We're looking into it, but in the meantime you can retry the update by commenting @dependabot recreate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file python Pull requests that update Python code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants