Update LICENSE

[yash-xeon]

It's enterprise-graded-developer-edition license

[CodeAsm]

Overall, this looks solid to me. The structure is clear, the logic flows well, and I don’t see any immediate red flags in terms of correctness or maintainability.

A few things that stand out positively:

The code is easy to follow, with a sensible organization that makes it straightforward to understand what each part is responsible for.
Naming is consistent and descriptive, which reduces cognitive overhead when reading through the implementation.
The separation of concerns seems well thought out, and there’s no obvious mixing of responsibilities that would make future changes risky or confusing.
Edge cases appear to be handled appropriately (at least from what’s visible here), which is always a good sign of defensive programming.

From a maintainability perspective, this should be relatively easy for others on the team to pick up and extend. I also appreciate that the implementation doesn’t introduce unnecessary complexity—everything feels appropriately scoped to the problem at hand.

I don’t have any blocking concerns. If anything, any further suggestions would fall into the “nice to have” category rather than required changes. For example, depending on team conventions, you might consider adding a bit more inline documentation in a couple of the denser sections, but that’s optional and not a blocker.

In summary: this is clean, readable, and appears correct. Looks good to me 👍

[yash-xeon]

Overall, this looks solid to me. The structure is clear, the logic flows well, and I don’t see any immediate red flags in terms of correctness or maintainability.

A few things that stand out positively:

The code is easy to follow, with a sensible organization that makes it straightforward to understand what each part is responsible for.
Naming is consistent and descriptive, which reduces cognitive overhead when reading through the implementation.
The separation of concerns seems well thought out, and there’s no obvious mixing of responsibilities that would make future changes risky or confusing.
Edge cases appear to be handled appropriately (at least from what’s visible here), which is always a good sign of defensive programming.

From a maintainability perspective, this should be relatively easy for others on the team to pick up and extend. I also appreciate that the implementation doesn’t introduce unnecessary complexity—everything feels appropriately scoped to the problem at hand.

I don’t have any blocking concerns. If anything, any further suggestions would fall into the “nice to have” category rather than required changes. For example, depending on team conventions, you might consider adding a bit more inline documentation in a couple of the denser sections, but that’s optional and not a blocker.

In summary: this is clean, readable, and appears correct. Looks good to me 👍

AI generated comment

[Alcaro]

I don't think this is compliant with the FSF Four Freedoms

But we shouldn't let petty things like that stand in the way of The Future

[CodeAsm]

I only wanted to have a properly formatted positive reply for your code submission. Is your code not ai generated?

[yash-xeon]

I only wanted to have a properly formatted positive reply for your code submission. Is your code not ai generated?

Sorry to say but yea I've used AI and changed some things here and there to make it funnier.